Re: Transcript: Anwar Ibrahim - The Financial Times.

Re: Transcript: Anwar Ibrahim - The Financial Times.

Dr Novandri Hasan Basri

It's been about a week now but suprisingly, the articles regarding Anwar, Hospital Pusrawi and Saiful are still circulating in the e-mails. I've received one today (another one!) from my friends but this time is from a different source -The Financial Times, UK. (dated 31th July 2008).

Well, it's Anwar Ibrahim's same old story, urging the people to back him up. And his same mistake, claiming that he is innocent.....again.

This is my reply to the e-mail. The content is almost the same as my previous articles but I better keep this e-mail in my own blog for future references.

BUT THEN, I wonder, where goes all the BN and UMNO leaders? They seems to be very quiet and not bother about this issue EVEN IF Anwar Ibrahim has tarnished their image in the international medias @ all over the world!

Where are they?

Enough just by making a very simple statement in our local papers? That's it? Itu sahaja?

Are their articles (to counter back the accusation made by Anwar Ibrahim) published in any of the international medias as Anwar has done?

Too bad, NONE so far.


(Anda tidak perlu baca di bawah jika telah membaca artikel-artikel sebelum ini).
................................................................................................................................................................

My reply :-

Hello my friends,

Please refer to Anwar's statement below.

As a doctor, I found that this statement below is wrong and misleading especially to ordinary people who don't have the knowledge in medicine.

Anwar Ibrahim: First of all, with all the evidence that is now before them, I don’t see any reason why the authorities should continue with these investigations of alleged sodomy. There is this medical report, which is authentic, very clear. A doctor who examined the accuser clearly ruled out any alleged sodomy - The Financial Times UkPublished: July 31 2008

1. It's NOT a medical report!. It's only a medical note examination. Medical report is more extensive with 'head to toe' thorough examination (definitely NOT as claimed by Anwar Ibrahim).

NEVER in the medical note ('medical report' as claimed by Anwar Ibrahim) mentioned that the doctor 'clearly ruled out any' alleged sodomy! NEVER!

The doctor only mentioned TRO (to rule out) alleged (sodomise).

My friends and Anwar Ibrahim (if you're reading this e-mail), 'to rule out' is NOT 'clearly ruled out'. They're two very different meanings!

TRO (to rule out) means the doctor is NOT sure the confirmed diagnosis. As a result, he has suggested Saiful to go the Government Hospital for proper medical check up.

Again as I've said, NEVER in the medical note mentioned tthat the doctor has clearly ruled out sodomy.

2. Dr Raja Petra and Dr Anwar Ibrahim interpereted the digital examination done in Saiful's anus that's no tearing, no active bleeding, no pus - No sodomy!

What a liar!

No tear, active bleeding or pus DO NOT rule out sodomy, my friends.

This 2 clowns must be joking.

I wonder, if anal sex leads to tearing, pus or active bleeding, clinics and hospitals from all over the world (especially Canada and other 3 countries - gay/lesbian marriage is legal) will have tremendous amount of anal related cases. Perrggh......

But if it's done aggresively, maybe.

My verdict : TRO sodomised - Advise to go to General Hospital for proper examination and done by by the specialist)

My friends,

In medicine, even poking a proctoscope in the patient's anus won't make them bleed or tear.

Proctoscope is an instrument made from METAL and slightly shorter than the size of man's penis (maybe smaller than ? ? ) and it's function is to visualize the inner part of the anus.

It's use to identify pile or fissure or any growth.

So, as I've said, the findings written by the doctor in Saiful's medical note DO NOT rule out sodomy.

(Send this message to all your friends. Let them know the truth.)

kzso - any doctor(s) out there to comment on this?