NUFFNANG

Monday 20 July 2009

Innocent until proven guilty!

Innocent until proven guilty!

The mentality of Malaysians especially those supporting Pakatan Rakyat are truly weird.

The presumption of innocence – being considered innocent until proven guilty – is a legal right that the accused in criminal trials has in many modern countries.

The so called Anwar Ibrahim lovers would be so defensive against the latest sodomy case of Anwar Ibrahim.

But they are to quick to make the decision of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) as being the culprit in the so called "MURDER" or suicide of Teoh Beng Hock.

What about the presemption of innocent towards MACC?

Or is it that whenever anything wrong that is done by the Pakatan Rakyat leaders, they are not wrong at all but they are 100% right and being conspired against by the Federal Government?

Don't be biased in making judgements? Is it that the Pakatan Rakyat leaders are so right, so free from corruption and so righteous that they cannot be prosecuted even though there are ample evidence to link them to criminal activities?

The Pakatan Rakyat leaders are only human, not angels so please remember about human traits which can be corrupted when they are in power.

Pakatan Rakyat has no right whatsoever in demanding the resignation of Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commisioner, no right whatsoever to deman a public apology from Datuk Seri Najib Razak our beloved Prime Minister, and Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin our Deputy Prime Minister and Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz from the Prime Minister's Department and the setting up of a royal commission of enquiry.

Why are the Pakatan Rakyat leaders so quick and hasty to judge the government as being the culprit? Something fishy is going on when they are the ones who could be conspiring in the so called "MURDER" as they call it of Teoh Beng Hock's death.

Again I would like to stress that remember, INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY does not only apply to Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy case though there are enough evidence to implicate him.

source : www.isuhot.com

No comments: