DAP Withheld Information From ROS
- GEORGE TOWN: (ROS) does not have to explain its decisions to a political party under the Societies Act 1966, said the body in its latest reply to the DAP.
- In the letter signed by Dasmond Das Michael Das, ROS has again reminded the DAP to hold fresh party elections.
- He said ROS came to its decision based on the provisions of the Act
- Dasmond said the DAP representatives who met the ROS during the investigations often asked for postponement of meetings or to shorten the process of the probe by giving excuses that they were busy with party politics.
- He added that DAP also often delayed sending necessary information or did not prepare it although they had been told to do so earlier.
- ROS came into the picture after complaints of electoral fraud surfaced in the December elections.
- This is the DAP's dirty tricks again. What happened to Competency, Accountability and Transparency?
What is so difficult about having the CEC Elections again? Where is the justice for the 753 mostly Indian members who were denied a chance to vote in the CEC?
That is the question. 753 delegates were NOT allowed to vote. The CEC elections must be held again and the 753 delegates - mostly Indians - must be allowed to vote. Then the outcome of the CEC of the DAP may be slightly different. In my view if the CEC elections were held again the following people may be elected into the DAP's top echelons :
No comments:
Post a Comment