Existence of half past six politicians in Pakatan Rakyat/Penipuan dan Pembangkang, bagai isi dengan kuku tak dapat dipisahkan lagi…/KU LI vs PEMIMPIN DE FACTO

Existence of half past six politicians in Pakatan Rakyat

Posted on July 27, 2011 by jebatmustdie

I find this piece of news laughable due to the sheer desperation from its originators.

Biometric system makes EC all-powerful, says Pakatan
By Clara Chooi
July 27, 2011

An official checks for traces of indelible ink on a voter’s hand during parliamentary elections in Tbilisi May 21, 2008. — Reuters file pic

KUALA LUMPUR, July 27 — Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders alleged today that a biometric voter verification system would only eliminate checks and balances in the present election process and grant the Election Commission (EC) absolute power over ballots cast on polling day.

In a joint statement here, the leaders said this was because the EC would be the only authority with exclusive access to the biometric system, allowing it to manipulate the voting process.

Polling and counting agents from political parties, they claimed, would no longer be required to monitor the polling process.

“They will phase out the involvement of party representatives to monitor the voting process. So there will no longer be any checks and balances.

“Voters will come in, present their MyKads, get their thumbprints scanned and that’s it. So there will be no need for checking agents because we will not have access to the system which verifies these voters anyway,” PKR strategy director Rafizi Ramli told The Malaysian Insider when contacted. - Did the EC announce how biometric validation will be conducted yet? Not yet. Thus, Rafizi is putting the cart before the horse.

He added, however, that if too many parties were allowed to access the biometric system, it would similarly be open to further abuses.

“But if only the EC has access, then who is to say that there is no manipulation?” he pointed out. - You are certain that too many parties (that include you) will abuse the system and you are also certain that if only EC has the access, they will manipulate it. I suggest we call down The Autobots to conduct, operate and monitor our general elections.

In the statement, signed by Rafizi, DAP’s Liew Chin Tong and PAS’s Dr Mohd Hatta Ramli, the leaders reiterated their stand that the use of indelible ink would still be the cheapest way to clean up the election process. - Cheapest doesn’t mean foolproof. It means that it is open more to abuse. More on this later.

They said that the opportunity for political parties to send their agents to monitor the voting process is the key criterion of a clean and fair election. - Again, sheer desperation just to make the news in Malaysian Insider. But wait a minute, all these while party agents CAN monitor the voting process therefore, Rafizi is indeed, confused. A confused politician is bad for the country.

“Therefore, any measures which aim to eliminate the involvement of political parties are contrary to the will of the people expressed through Bersih 2.0. The EC must return to Bersih’s eight demands. - what measures? No announcement from EC yet. This is coming from a highly imaginative but half past six mindset.

“The country’s electoral system needs an overall reform, not minor amendments which will not only cost hundreds of millions, but also raise new issues to fuel public anger,” they said. - so, indelible ink is an overall reform?? Are you sure you know what you’re talking about?

The PR leaders argued that the new computerised system would also be subject to technical glitches and security risks. This, they pointed out, is likely why the EC itself had admitted that the system would not be ready in time for the 13th general election. – EC will conduct dry run on this.

“More important, however, is the inability of the biometric system to prevent phantom voters or double-voting because it is using the wrong approach, i.e. those with identification cards are considered valid voters … this would allow many illegal immigrants with identification cards to vote in GE-13,” they said. - there were no such instances or cases of double voting in this country. A FACT that even Ambiga of Bersih could not find any evidence of this. Anyone of you here with a shred of documented proof that says someone had voted twice using different ICs, or different names please submit it to whoever you wish that might highlight your proof. 

The leaders also claimed that the prime minister and the EC’s support for the proposed biometric system proves that the government has admitted to discrepancies in the current election process. - maybe government should not even do anything. They should just sit back and relax and don’t change anything. Obviously, constant improvement is a bad thing for Pakatan buffoons. We improve ourselves when better alternatives and technology is presented to us.

“This proves that the Barisan Nasional (BN) leadership cannot afford to deny the voices of those who joined Bersih 2.0’s rally,” they said. - then you should be grateful that the government is listening for ways to improve instead of maintaining status quo or doing a Mugabe and cut both your hands. Since the government is not cruel (contrary to what your perverted mind would like to think), they strive to make things more efficient. Which can only be a good thing.

On a side note, kudos for The Malaysian Insider for showing picture of people in a former Russian colony checking for indelible ink.

By the way, do you know that in United States of America, they have only about to revamp their elections law? They have just adopted a law for a electoral process whereby photo identification is a requirement for you to vote. Apparently, all this while, it is not a requirement to produce ID when voting!

We in Malaysia is lightyears ahead of them and yet, the people in Bersih wants us to regress few steps and use indelible ink.

One of the biggest complaint of indelible ink is that unscrupulous people (they can be from Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat or other good for nothing people) can roam the rural/urban areas and trick unsuspecting voters to use the indelible ink before the election starts thus the voters cannot vote even when they turned up at the election centres. Can we afford this risk? If your grandfather’s cousin was tricked by someone a day before the election and permanent ink has been swiped on to his finger nails, he can sue the EC millions if he was prevented to vote. This is provided by the law.

The biometric on the other hand does not try to replace the IC as the IC is the all important document that can verify a voter.

For instance, can you pass the automated gateway at the airports without your passports by just scanning your fingerprints? Of course you can’t. Same with voting process.

The fingerprint being scanned by the biometric system is just a verifying tool that enables the system to recognise that the holder of the IC is indeed the same person.

It is a system that double checks your identity. Once your particulars and thumbprints have been recorded in the system, you may not be able to vote anywhere else. If there are two same fingerprints being detected, the system will flag the person and will alert the authority. This is a foolproof way to prevent phantom voters.

This is also the very same system that is preventing criminals from entering our country through official entry points (if they enter by swimming to our beaches then a bit hard to detect).

KLIA, LCCT and JB entry points for example process minimum 100K, 90K and 80K people respectively on daily basis without any major breakdowns using the biometric system. The technology is here and ready.

Importantly, party representatives from either party can still monitor the voting process by getting a live screen of electoral roll being validated by the biometric system. Previously, they have this list of voters in each polling centres which they cross check with ballot paper figures. Now, they should just add this simple technique of real time data streaming. They can then validate the voting process themselves.

Clearly the Pakatan leaders, being half past six themselves, have not studied the system to make a well informed statement. But then again, I believe they just want to trick people who are unaware of their deceit so that they can continue playing this issue over and over again.

After all, being irrelevant is a death-knell to 3rd rate politicians.

source : jebat must die

Penipuan dan Pembangkang, bagai isi dengan kuku tak dapat dipisahkan lagi…

Tidak dapat saya bayangkan kehidupan yang penuh dengan pura-pura, hipokrasi dan penipuan. Namun, itulah kehidupan pemimpin parti pembangkang. Daripada Ketua Pembangkang, hinggalah ke pemimpin-pemimpin bawahannya. Hidup mereka tidak sempurna sekiranya tidak menipu.

Anwar Ibrahim. Apa yang benar padanya? Peribadinya sendiri penuh kepura-puraan. Lakonannya bagaikan seorang “pak syiekh” terbilang. Tapi di sebalik khutbah dan lafaz kalamullahnya, terselindung peribadi yang jijik, busuk dan hanyir. Pernah dulu saya tertipu dengan imejnya, namun tidak lagi kini.

Sejak tembelangnya pecah pada tahun 1997, saya sebagai pemerhati politik, mula mengesyaki ada yang tak kena padanya. Rupanya bukan Azizan saja yang diliwat, malah Sukma, Dr. Munaweer Aneez dan Mior turut terlibat. Ingatkan dia hanya berkenan pada lelaki saja, pelacur pun dia minat. Bukan saya yang kata, bekas “supplier” dan rakan baiknya sendiri, Nallakarupan yang beritahu!

Sehingga kini, Anwar masih menipu. Sudah tua nak mampus pun dia masih menipu dan masih gemar pada “anak muda”. Entah siapa lagi selain Saiful Bukhari yang pernah menjadi mangsanya. Bukan itu saja, dasar-dasar Kerajaan pun dia kelentong rakyat. Yang memeritkan itu, rakyat mudah tertipu dengan pidatonya yang retorik itu. Sampai bilakah dia akan terus begitu? Sampai ke liang kubur?

Pas juga sama. Malah lebih teruk lagi, golongan ini memperalatkan agama untuk kepentingan politik mereka. Terbaru, Timbalan Presidennya, Mat Sabu “Wilcha” tertangkap menipu! Hairan. Katanya, penganut-penganut agama Pas ini memperjuangkan Islam. Tapi, takkanlah mereka tidak tahu tentang dosa menipu? Jika seorang yang dia tipu, senanglah dia nak minta maaf secara berdepan. Tapi dia tipu rakyat! Dia kena minta maaf secara terbuka!

Pada mulanya Mat Sabu mendakwa dia dirempuh oleh kenderaan polis jenis “land rover”. Tapi, selepas polis menyiarkan CCTV rakaman insiden Mat Sabu tertangkap itu, jelas sekali tidak ada sebarang “contact” antara dia dengan mana-mana kenderaan polis. Mat Sabu sudah gelabah. Tembelangnya pecah pulak dah!

Dia pun menipu lagi. Memandangkan “land rover” polis di dalam rakaman tersebut kelihatan melepasi motorsikalnya dan kebetulan ada sebuah lagi kenderaan polis jenis “Proton Waja” di belakang, cepat-cepat dia tukar kenyataan. Kali ini, Mat Sabu kata dia dilanggar pula oleh “Waja” tersebut! Pulak?!

Cakap apa ni? Cakap putar belit? Sekejap dilanggar “land rover”, dua minggu kemudian ubah pula cakap dirempuh “Waja”. Yang mana satu yang betul ni? Beginikah cara muamalah dan akhlak yang ditunjukkan oleh seorang Timbalan Presiden yang kononnya mendaulatkan Islam dan hukum hakamnya?

Sebenarnya, dalam kejadian insiden tersebut. Mat Sabu tidak pun dirempuh oleh mana-mana kenderaan polis. Menurut saksi yang ada ditempat kejadian, motorsikal yang dibonceng Mat Sabu terlanggar pembahagi jalan dan mereka berdua terjatuh. Polis sendiri yang tolong angkat mereka berdua. Bukan mereka cakap terima kasih pun, ditohmahnya pulak pihak polis tersebut! Akhlah sebeginikah yang Rasulullah ajar?

DAP? Siapa kata DAP tidak berbohong? Sila tanya Karpal Singh bagaimana dia menuduh Anwar meliwat di dalam parlimen pada tahun 1997. Karpal kata, dia ada bukti kukuh dan mencabar Tun Dr. Mahathir untuk menyiasat Anwar yang ketika itu Timbalan Perdana Menteri.

Tapi, kini dia jadi peguam Anwar untuk membela “sesumpah” itu dari tuduhan liwat! Dulu dia menuduh, tapi sekarang dia membela pula? Ini lebih teruk dari menipu! Jenis manusia begini hanya layak dihalau keluar dari terus menjadi petualang negara. Sudahlah begitu, dia anti pula pada Islam. Macam tu boleh buat kawan ke?

Ini baru tiga orang tokoh pembangkang yang sempat saya ceritakan penipuan mereka. Itu pun secara ringkas. Sebenarnya, jika nak diceritakan tentang kepuraan, hipokrasi dan bohong Anwar secara terperinci, dua bulan pun tak habis. Itu baru Anwar. Belum lagi Mat Sabu, dan pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang yang lain.

Persoalannya, tidak penatkah mereka menipu rakyat di negara mereka sendiri? Tidak penatkah mereka melakukan onar di Tanah Melayu ini? Kerana kepentingan diri dan mengejar kuasa, mereka sanggup merosakkan minda rakyat dengan pembohongan yang seolah-olah benar. Rakyat “ter…”percaya pada cerita mitos dongeng mereka tanpa usul periksa.

Hakikat ini memang payah untuk ditelan. Pahitnya memang sukar untuk dirasa. Namun bagaimanapun, kami akan cuba meneutralkan kembali apa yang sudah ditohmah Anwar dan rakan-rakannya kepada rakyat. Cuma satu yang kami pinta. Usahlah menyebelahi mana-mana pihak buat masa ini. Lihatlah kebenaran yang kami bawakan dan pastinya rakyat semua akan menolak Anwar serta rakan-rakannya. Kemudian, terserahlah untuk memilih antara Barisan Nasional atau Pakatan Haram yang durjana…

Wallahualam.

source : perak today

KU LI vs PEMIMPIN DE FACTO

1. TERLEBIH dahulu JENTAYUABAKA mengucapkan selamat berpuasa kepada muslimin dan muslimat. Sebelum berpuasa, seperti biasa penulis juga mengambil kesempatan memohon maaf jika penulisan jentayuabaka selama ini mengguris hati dan minda pembaca. Apa pun perkogsian minda adalah sehat untuk kita sama-sama menilai rasional, faktanya, sebab musababnya dan tujuan masa depannya.

2. Tengku Razaliegh bukan asing dalam dunia politik, Tun Dr. Mahathir pernah menulis, sekiranya Ku Li sabar sedikit, beliau sudah pasti akan menjadi Perdana Menteri. Tun Dr. Mahathir mengatakan, bukan beliau marah atau sakit hati Ku Li mencabarnya sebagai Presiden UMNO suatu ketika dahulu.

3. Tengku Razaliegh pernah mengetuai kumpulan parti pembangkang dengan nama Gagasan Rakyat, di mana beberapa hari menjelang PRU-10, Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) keluar daripada BN dan menyertai Gagasan Rakyat. Kekuatan Ku Li menjadikan Terengganu tumpas ke tangan PAS, Kelantan kekal dengan PAS.

4. Namun, Ku LI juga seorang pemimpin yang berpijak di bumi yang nyata, seorang yang rasional, akhirnya beliau membubarkan Semangat 46 dan menyertai semula UMNO. Bukan mudah kembali ke pangkal jalan sekiranya tidak kerana sayangkan agama, bangsa dan negaranya. PKR sebuah lagi serpihan UMNO,bilakah pula hendak dibubarkan?

5. DAP mahu pun PAS, mereka sudah sedar, perjalanan mereka menuju Putrajaya tidak akan tercapai dengan bergantung kepada pemimpin de facto. Mereka ingin Ku Li kembali memimpin mereka. Mereka sedar tidak ada gunanya, malah membuang masa hanya membangkang dasar-dasar kerajaan persekutuan secara membuta tuli, brutal dan senteng.

Mereka sedar, untuk terus kuat, pembangkang mesti jadi pembangkang yang bijak, pembangkang untuk pembangunan, bukan membangkang gila nak jadi Perdana Menteri, bukan jadi pembangkang yang merosakkan perpaduan dan kekuatan sedia ada negara, bukan membangkang kerana hanya menjadi pembangkang.

6. Kerana itu, Ku Li kelihatannya menepati aspirasi mereka. Ku Li menyokong kerajaan negeri Kelantan dalam isu Royalti Minyak, itu rasioanliti Ku Li. Namun, Ku Li mempertahankan parti UMNO dan kerajaan Persekutuan.

7. Ku Li, anak Raja yang turun menjadi pemimpin rakyat. Ku Li perlu diberi peluang menjadi sebahagian daripada pemimpin masa depan. Kerajaan BN memerlukan pembangkang yang kuat, pembangkang yang membangkang untuk kemajuan negara dan rakyat, bukan pembangkang yang gila hanya mahu jadi Perdana Menteri sahaja.

8. Apakah Ku Li sekali lagi akan membawa kepada penyatuan umat Islam dan bangsa Melayu di negara ini sama seperti ketika zaman Tun Razak dahulu. Apakah Ku Li jambatan kepada perpaduan?

Ada cerita di belakang cerita. Pemimpin De Facto tidak perlu gundah.

paarlimeng tranung

lagu bola - Malaysia Tiger (Harimau Malaya) BroXcute-with lirik

by Ustaz Mohd Kazim Elias- Ketuanan Melayu

BERSIH 2.0; HITLER MARAH KEBODOHAN PKR

Ultras Malaya kalau anda gembira Malaysia vs Hong Kong

Malaysia vs Pakistan-injit2 semut,sepa sakit boleh balik.AVI

Malaysia vs Pakistan-Dua hati jadi satu.AVI

Malaysia vs Pakistan Khairul Fahmi

Malaysia vs Pakistan-Ooooo.. MALAYSIA!!.AVI

ULTRAS MALAYA at HAKIM, Malaysia vs Pakistan4.AVI

Ultras Malaya new chant for Final AFF Suzuki Cup 2010

Ultras Malaya - Bersama Selamanya at EPL Masters Football Malaysia Cup 2011

Ultras Malaya Inilah barisan kita-Malaysia vs Hong Kong.AVI

Ultras Malaya

ULTRAS MALAYA GEMPAK (M'sia vs Pakistan)

lagu bola - Malaysia Tiger (Harimau Malaya) BroXcute-with lirik

Ultras Malaya - pasukan sorak bolasepak malaysia.mp4

ultras malaya-keranamu hatiku malaysia

Theme song - Harimau Malaya 2011

Ultras Malaya 'Berjuanglah Pahlawanku' dengan lirik

lagu bola - Malaysia Tiger (Harimau Malaya) BroXcute-with lirik

Ultras Malaya Buatan Malaysia

satu suara satu semangat (HARIMAU MALAYA)

HARAMSANEE AL-KAZEEB

Lawak pagi ini..!!! Kenderaan apakah ini murid-muridddd...?!!!

HARAMSANEE AL-KAZEEB

Salam 2 all.

09 Julai 2011 akan diingati dalam sejarah negara sebagai "Hari Haramsanee Al-Kazeeb", memperingati pembohongan besar yang dilakukan oleh golongan desperado yang ketagihan untuk merampok Putrajaya melalui jalan "pintu belakang".

Himpunan yang bercirikan dua haram-"himpunan haramsanee (sanee bermakna dua didalam bahasa 'arab)". Pertama kerana dianjurkan oleh kumpulan yang telah diisytiharkan haram oleh Pendaftar Petubuhan. Kedua kerana ianya himpunan yang mahu dibuat tanpa permit-satu perhimpunan haram!

Bukan sahaja ianya "himpunan haramsanee", malah ianya penuh dengan pembohongan dan putar belit.

Teman tersenyum melihat gelagat kaum desperado ini memutar kisah dongeng kononnya teman termasuk didalam senarai kumpulan "Bersih" didalam perintah larangan Mahkamah keatas 91 individu yang ditegah berada dibeberapa tempat di KL pada 09 Julai.

Samada pembawa cerita itu skrew kepalanya longgar, ataupun pembohong. Teman menafikan sekeras-kerasnya pembohongan ini; dan teman sedikit pun tidak pernah menyokong atau mendokong kaum politikus kotor yang mengaku diri mereka "Bersih" tetapi penuh kekotoran. Jelas pembohongan sudah sebati dengan kaum ini, dan itulah yang dibuktikan dalam himpunan haram kaum yang teman label sebagai "Himpunan Haramsanee Al-Kazeeb". Al-Kazeeb dalam bahasa 'arab bermakna pembohong!!!

Pembohongan pertama mereka ialah membohongi Tuanku YDP Agong. Mereka memberi akujanji kepada Tuanku YDP Agong bahawa mereka mahu mengadap dan memaklumkan pembatalan himpunan haram tersebut. Akujanji itu diberi setelah Tuanku bertitah melahirkan pendirian Tuanku mengenai himpunan haram tersebut. Namun akujanji dan jaminan himpunan haram dijalanraya tersebut bukan sahaja tidak dibatalkan, malahan cara ianya dilaksanakan jelas kelihatan ianya memang telah dirancang dengan teliti.

Jelas semasa mengadap Tuanku, memang mereka tidak berniat langsung untuk membatalkan himpunan haram itu. Sebaliknya kebenaran mengadap itu dijadikan alat sekadar untuk memberi "perasa halal" kepada himpunan haram oleh kumpulan yang haram. Mereka berjaya membohongi Tuanku YDP Agong yang telah dengan ikhlas menerima mereka masuk mengadap.

Dan majlis mengadap itu dijadikan alat propaganda untuk menghalakan tindakan haram mereka. Ini adalah satu penderhakaan dan pengkhianatan besar kepada Tuanku YDP Agong; mana-mana warganegara yang ta'at dan setia kepada Tuanku dan negara ini tidak akan berani lakukan! Kewarganegaraan kaum ini sepatutnya dikaji semula; dan mereka wajar dikenakan tindakan yang tegas tanpa ampun!

Mereka turut berbohong bila mendabik dada mengisytiharkan himpunan haram itu disertai oleh puluhan ribu orang, walaupun hakikat sebenarnya tidaklah seramai yang dicanangkan. Dan itulah sebenarnya mengapa mereka mengadakannya pada hari Sabtu tengahari. Sebab mereka tahu jumlah penyokong mereka tidak ramai. Mereka perlu lahirkan persepsi himpunan haramsanee itu mendapat sambutan. Kerana itu ianya wajib dibuat tengahari Sabtu.

Kerana itu adalah waktu puncak dimana ramai orang akan turun ke KL untuk bersantai, membeli-belah, ke pasar malam Jalan TAR atau sekadar berlibur samada di KLCC, Sogo, Masjid Jamek, Jalan TAR dan stesyen LRT saperti Stesyen Masjid Jamek dan Hentian Puduraya akan pasti menjadi tumpuan awam.

Dan sudah pasti bila berlaku himpunan haram, orang awam samada akan menjadi "curious onlooker" ataupun terperangkap sekali dengan mereka. Apa pun jumlah mereka akan kelihatan seolah-olah ramai. Apatah lagi kalau gambar dan rakaman video diambil dari susut tertentu; ianya mampu memberikan persepsi ianya ramai.

Tetapi tidaklah seramai yang mereka canangkan. Menurut sumber yang sahih, jumlah yang terlibat tidak melebihi 10,000 orang pun, jauh dari angka ratusan ribu yang mereka kompangkan akan turun!

Pembohongan berterusan apabila Timbalan Presiden PAS Mat Sabu mendakwa dirempuh oleh landrover polis. Siap berkerusi roda lagi! Kitaran semula sebuah drama dahulukala! Ternyata ALLAH juga Maha Perancang. Paparan video CCTV jelas membuktikan segala pembohongan!

Apa yang menyedihkan ialah pimpinan sebuah parti yang menjubahkan diri dengan warna Islam boleh terjebak dengan gejala pembohongan yang sebelum ini menjadi monopoli dan kepakaran pihak tertentu. Virus "al-kazeeb" telah menular bagai kanker yang tiada batasan.

Pembohongan kaum haramsanee ini tidak mengenal batas apabila kematian juga mereka putarbohongkan. Pemergian Allahyarham Baharudin yang mati akibat serangan sakit jantung semasa menyertai himpunan haramsanee ini diputarbelitkan dan dikompangkan sebagai kezaliman pihak berkuasa dengan menyelitkan "drama kematian" Suhardi. Habis satu dunia dibohongi, sebagaimana pembohongan 16 Sept.

Videoklip kematian palsu itu diputar seantero dunia. Derma dikutip tanpa sekelumit kemaluan.

Pelik sungguh kaum haramsanee ini. Videoklip Mat CD @ Mat China-Doll yang begitu jelas mereka pertikaikan; sebaliknya videoklip penipuan "kematian palsu Suhardi" mereka telan dan terima bulat-bulat tanpa soal sikitpun. Terus di isytiharkan ianya sebagai "syahid", dan derma jihad dilancarkan yang kemungkinan besarnya akan berakhir saperti derma peristiwa Memali! Hilang ghaibul-ghuyub!

Dalam keriuhan himpunan haramasanee itu, tetiba tersebar pula berita dan gambar didunia cyber seorang yang kelihatan nazak didalam hospital. Siap dengan "kolar-tengkok"! Lalu diputar pusing dongeng kezaliman pihak berkuasa. Ternyata cerita lama berulang kembali. Pelik sungguh, dalam ramai-ramai kaum himpunan haramsanee ini, hanya seorang sahaja yang masuk hospital dan kelihatan nazak dengan kolar-tengkok siap terpasang! Oh ya, terlupa pula dengan kisah seorang lagi yang masuk hospital siap dengan kerusi roda setelah "dirempuh" dengan brutal dan ganas oleh landrover Polis DiRaja Malaysia!

Adengan pembohongan ini berterusan apabila ada pihak mendakwa Presiden PAS dikasari oleh pihak berkuasa. Sekali lagi cubaan untuk meraih simpati dan menimbulkan kebencian kepada pihak berkuasa. Alhamdulillah Presiden PAS, yang baru sahaja mengisytiharkan tiada negara Islam didalam Al Quran, masih mempunyai sedikit kewarasan dan membuat kenyataan menafikan beliau dikasari, malah menceritakan tentang layanan baik yang diterima, dengan kisah "saya dihantar polis sampai kerumah"!

Sebenarnya banyak lagi pembohongan dan penipuan yang telah dilakukan oleh kaum himpunan haramsanee ini. Pembohongan kepada umat Islam bahawa himpunan itu walau diketuai oleh seorang kafir harbi anti Islam telah mengelabukan segelintir kalkatoo yang terpedaya dengan kilauan cahaya mahkota kekuasaan; walaupun sebelum ini mereka pernah mengisytiharkan jihad dan sabil terhadap sikafir harbi itu!

Kita tidak menentang hak berhimpun. Kita tahu ianya dijamin oleh Perlembagaan. Yang kita tentang ialah demonstrasi jalanan. Yang kita lawan ialah perarakan dijalanan. Yang menyusahkan rakyat dan orang ramai. Yang kita bantah ialah politik jalanraya. Yang kita mahu cegah ialah politik berasakan pembohongan dan putarbelit; semuanya kerana nafsu serakah mahu merampok Putrajaya "at all cost".

Sehingga sampai keperingkat berani menipu dan membohongi Tuanku YDP Agong. Ini adalah penderhakaan dan pengkhianatan yang wajib ditentang dan diperangi oleh tiap individu rakyat dan warganegara yang ta'at kepada Tuanku YDP Agong dan cintakan keamanan, kedamaian dan keharmonian.

Kita rakyat Malaysia pelbagai agama dan bangsa, dan dari semua lapisan mengutuk keras himpunan haramsanee ini. Kita mendesak pihak berkuasa supaya mengambil tindakan tegas tanpa gentar dan takut. Ingatlah, "majoriti senyap" sedang memerhati langkah pihak kerajaan selanjutnya, janganlah sampai keperingkat rakyat yang cintakan keamanan dan keharmonian terpaksa mengambil tindakan sendiri demi memelihara dan memartabatkan kedaulatan dan keselamatan negara ini.

Wassalam.

Zulkifli Bin Noordin
Rabu
25 Sya'ban 1432
27 Julai 2011

Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

Posted on July 20, 2011 by jebatmustdie

I received this email from one of the readers few days ago. I copied it here for the benefit of the readers out there. Thank you.

—————————————-

I found this article on BERSIH v2.0 (forwarded from a friend in the UK) very factual, balanced and insightful.

If you love Malaysia, love the truth and hate dirty politics, please forward this article to all your friends.

Regards,

Azhari

Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

The Bersih 2.0 rally on the 9th July 2011 caught the attention of our political leaders as well as the international media.

I am fortunate to be working overseas for the last 10 years. I do love Malaysia and look forward to come back once I have completed my career goals. As a proud citizen of Malaysia, I would like to provide an independent assessment and inject some rational thinking on the current situation.

Many Malaysians who joined the rally on the 9th July 2011 have witnessed the level of unity in rallying for the same cause, i.e a fair elections for the country. There has not been one event in Malaysia for some time that has rallied so much support to fight for one cause.

Whether it is planned or unplanned, the NGOs and the organizers have rallied support from the political leaders (mainly opposition) to catapult this rally to a different level. While the objectives of the rally were apparently focused purely on electoral reform, most Malaysians surely would recognise that the Bersih rally has become – whether rightly or wrongly – political in nature, much like the protest rallies which took place during the Reformasi days of Anwar Ibrahim in 1997. The logic and rationale behind getting 20,000 – 50,000 people to show up on the streets remains a mystery despite the existence of various open and civilized channels. Even more interestingly, the leader of Bersih 2.0, Datuk Ambiga, was granted an audience with the King several days before the date of the rally, which was ostensibly called so that Bersih 2.0 can hand over a memorandum to the King!

However you look at the Bersih 2.0, one has to give all credit to the organizers for orchestrating a successful event / rally, especially in terms of impacting the thinking of the mass population of Malaysians.

On that note, I think there are generally two groups in this country. The first group is the silent majority (i.e those who prefers to stay home and be with their families in the wake of a rally). This group probably constitutes 80% of our population. Most of the time, they are happy to lead their own lives, and are mostly happy with the way things are in Malaysia. There are probably one or two things they aren’t too happy with, but nothing that would spur them to complain to the newspapers or in the blogs.

The second group is what I consider to be the loud minority. These are folks who are perpetually unhappy over the way things are in our fair country. Maybe they don’t like certain policies which have been put in place (and which have likely contributed in some way or other to the current prosperity and success of our country!) In any case, these are the ones who usually speak (and sometimes scream) the loudest on blogs and Youtube, injecting truth and lies and using emotional or racial sentiments to make their point.

While I respect the right of the 20,000 – 50,000 people that attended the Bersih 2.0 rally to demonstrate peacefully, I feel that they were mostly taken for a ride by the loud minority.

If one were to interview the people on the street who came to the rally on the 9th of July 2011 and ask them the question “What are you fighting for today, sir?”, I can guarantee many of them are not able to answer accurately. The majority of those who turned up on the streets are rempits, pakcik tua on the street, people from the village and some unfortunate urban poor people who were given false hope that rallying alone can somehow change the country.

While many Facebook supporters have “liked” Bersih 2.0 before the rally, you can see only a handful of professionals, private sector people, gathered on the street on the actual day.

What you will hear generally are various answers such as “Walk of democracy”, “We want fair democracy”, “We hate the Government”, “Say no to Corruption”, “Reformasi”, “Allahuakbar”, etc.

From here, you can witness inconsistencies of understanding among those who claim to support Bersih 2.0. This is not surprising, since the Bersih 2.0 organizers are rallying a vast number of different groups (NGOs as well as politically-motivated groups) to support one cause. Hence, the understanding and true intention of Bersih 2.0 was “simplified” to ignite more fire and encourage a herd mentality amongst the people.

The problem with the whole Bersih 2.0 campaign is that people forget to really look at the 8 points that the Bersih proponents are pursuing. Most of the people in the street rally don’t even have a clue about any or all of the 8 points and the argument for and against each of them. The whole thing has evolved into a war of perception which is based on a simplistic divide:

(A) If you support Bersih, then you reject corruption and embrace democracy and you are righteous

(B) If you reject Bersih, then you are dirty, corrupt, anti democracy and wicked

Given this war of perception, it is clear that (A) will win over (B) in terms of popular public support. The opposition joined in on (A) and the Government and the EC, including Barisan Nasional is demonized.

When I watched the Youtube videos on Bersih 2.0, the organizers were being very rhetorical about the rally, and why Malaysians should attend the rally. Because Bersih 2.0 has now “transformed” from the original 8 demands into the subject of “Cops are bad, look at this country”, most Malaysians are now fuelled with anger. Nonchalantly, the 8 demands has now been quietly swept aside without any discussion or debate or clear explanation from the present Government.

That is why I would like to return to the original point of Bersih 2.0: the 8-point demands for electoral reform from Bersih 2.0. Let us, Malaysians, return back to the subject. The 8-point demand.

I hope my independent assessment on the 8 demands by BERSIH v2.0 will inject some rational thinking and perspective so that all Malaysians can appreciate the context and content rather than marching on the streets aimlessly without any clear objective or reason.

Lets now look at the 8 demands raised by Bersih and subject them to scrutiny:

1. Clean the electoral roll

The electoral roll is marred with irregularities such as deceased persons and multiple persons registered under a single address or non-existent addresses. The electoral roll must be revised and updated to wipe out these ‘phantom voters’. The rakyat have a right to an electoral roll that is an accurate reflection of the voting population.

In the longer term, BERSIH 2.0 also calls for the EC to implement an automated voter registration system upon eligibility to reduce irregularities.

RESPONSE:

Based on the CIA World Fact book, death in Malaysia is 4.93 per 1,000 population (based on July 2011). Through extrapolation, for 28 million population, the estimated number of deaths in a year is 138,040 persons. Assuming the information is not updated in JPN over a period of 5 years, on a worst case scenario, the total “un-updated record of deceased persons” is 690,020 people.

According to the EC, we have 11.4 million registered voters. Assuming EC did not update their database due deceased people, this represent 6% inaccuracy of the true / actual registered voters.

Malaysians should ask: can a 6% “inaccuracy / irregularity” (on a worst case scenario) be a strong point to bash the EC or the Government for being unfair? I think this is absurd and politically motivated.

The fact that the opposition won more states in the next GE showed that fair election / democracy is in place.

Therefore, my question for those who are politically inclined: does the 6% translate into a sure win for the the political parties (including opposition) in the next GE?

For automatic voter registration as proposed by Bersih v2.0, many people have expressed disagreement on this subject.

There is a writer who posted something in Malaysian Insider that I would like to share…

“Not that I have anything against people registering to vote.

I am a registered voter myself. However, to force something on someone — be it religion, racism and even voter registration — is something I just can’t agree with.

It’s against a person’s free will. I see it as similar to parents determining their kids’ religions at birth; performing circumcision on a kid who doesn’t know any better; or even how parents of a male child with no penis would show off their kid in a photo opportunity for the Malaysian media, as we saw in 2009.

There are many fears in having an automatic-registration system, primarily on the basis of privacy.”

As for voters registered with a non-existent addresses, everyone knows that we move from one place to another as we grow. Let’s assume that Ali was born in Kuala Lipis. He has an IC which has the address of his family in Kuala Lipis. 20 years later he migrated to Kuala Lumpur, then 5 years later he was posted to Terengganu for offshore assignment with Murphy Oil. 6 years later he was posted to lead a project in Sarawak. Does it mean he has to update his IC address and inform EC every time he moves to another address?

If let’s say 10 million of our population is affected by this, do you think it is practical to enforce it in reality my dear fellow Malaysians?

In short, Bersih’s demand of the automatic voters registration basically forces people to be registered. And that cannot be seen as democracy!

It definite contradicts Bersih’s principles of having a fair democracy.

2. Reform postal ballot

The current postal ballot system must be reformed to ensure that all citizens of Malaysia are able to exercise their right to vote. Postal ballot should not only be open for all Malaysian citizens living abroad, but also for those within the country who cannot be physically present in their voting constituency on polling day. Police, military and civil servants too must vote normally like other voters if not on duty on polling day.

The postal ballot system must be transparent. Party agents should be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting.

RESPONSE:

According to the Government website, Malaysia has approximately 1.2 million civil servants. The police & military are consistently on duty and geographically dispersed throughout the country. In fact, they are on duty too during elections, etc.

If the police, military are forced to vote normally, then they are forced to leave their duty in various locations. Imagine leaving the jungle, strategic border locations just to vote. I think this is not practical at all.

On this note, Bersih 2.0 also made a proposal to EC for party agents to monitor the entire process of postal voting. Well, this has not happened in any other countries. Please name me one country which allows parties on both divide to “intervene” in the EC processes or postal voting.

Also, postal voting happens not only for police and military personnel who are on duty, but also Malaysians who vote overseas. If Bersih 2.0 wants party agents to be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting, does that mean that party agents need to be posted whenever and wherever there are Malaysians voting overseas? (I’m sure some of them don’t mind having the excuse to have a nice holiday overseas, “in the name of democracy”!)

I think this proposal suggests deep paranoia and mistrust of key institutions in the country, including the Elections Commission (SPR), which I think is simply pathetic.

In conclusion, there has not been any real issues in terms of postal voting, whether in Malaysia or in other countries. After all, from a bigger picture perspective, the impact of postal votes is small compared to the actual votes in the various constituencies.

As a citizen who support fair elections in this country, I suggest that we should be focusing on the actual voting mechanism at the various constituencies rather than debating day and night on postal voting, which, in reality, produces a minimal impact to the election results.

For those who are politically inclined to dwell on the numbers and think that this is still not fair because the postal votes can ensure a better win, imagine this: Assuming 100% of the 1.2 million servants are forced to do postal voting, that represent 10% of the 11.4 million registered voters in this country. Assuming ceteris paribus, if you divide 11.4 million registered voters by 222 constituencies, that is 51,351 votes for each constituency. Therefore the postal votes (i.e 10% of 11.4m) constitute 5,400 votes vs. 51,351 votes.

With all the anger and insult which I hear from the political leaders and Bersih organizers, my conclusion is simple. The impact of postal voting to the overall result is minimal.

The majority swing or “success” for each political party is based on the actual voters who attend, register and vote on the actual election day. Surely as Malaysians, we shouldn’t be so easily fuelled and vortexed into something so small until we lose our logical reasoning.

I ask again the question to my dear fellow Malaysians. Looking at the maths, is this something worth fighting for? Is this what we call unfair election or democracy by the opposition?

3. Use of indelible ink

Indelible ink must be used in all elections. It is a simple, affordable and effective solution in preventing voter fraud. In 2007, the EC decided to implement the use of indelible ink. However, in the final days leading up to the 12th General Elections, the EC decided to withdraw the use of indelible ink citing legal reasons and rumours of sabotage.

Bersih 2.0 demands for indelible ink to be used for all the upcoming elections. Failure to do so will lead to the inevitable conclusion that there is an intention to allow voter fraud.

RESPONSE:

Less than 20 countries out of 194 countries use inedible ink in their elections. Indelible ink is NOT used by developed countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Singapore, France, Japan and many others. It is used mainly in less developed countries with large populations.

Some of the countries include Afghanistan, Benin, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gambia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon, Mauritania, Peru, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Tchad, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.

It is also worth to note that indelible ink is not a fool-proof method and has its disadvantages such as:

· Indelible ink itself can be used to commit electoral fraud by marking opponent party members before they have the chance to cast their votes; and

· There have been cases in Afghanistan where “indelible” ink have washed off voters’ fingers using bleach; such ink was blamed for contributing to fraud in the first Afghan presidential election in 2005.

In short, if Malaysia decides to use indelible ink, for a country that has a comprehensive database and biometric identification of its citizens, it can be viewed as step backwards for the nation and not a step forward. Remember, less than 20 countries out of 194 countries uses indelible ink in their general elections.

For those countries who don’t use inedible ink, do you regard them as corrupt?

Bersih organizers have really managed to divert the attention of the public on this. Pure deception

4. Minimum 21 days campaign period

The EC should stipulate a campaign period of not less than 21 days. A longer campaign period would allow voters more time to gather information and deliberate on their choices. It will also allow candidates more time to disseminate information to rural areas. The first national elections in 1955 under the British Colonial Government had a campaign period of 42 days but the campaign period for 12th GE in 2008 was a mere 8 days.

RESPONSE:

There is no standard or best practice in any countries to determine the optimum campaign period. For example, Singapore has a 9-day campaign period, the United Kingdom has 17 days and Philippines has a 90-day campaign period. The misconception by the public at large is that the campaign period (whether it is 5 days, 21 days, 40 days, 60 days or even 100 days) guarantees a fair election.

Campaign activities must be viewed as an on-going activity by the ruling and opposition parties and not a one-off activity due to General Election. Both parties must work hard daily or throughout the year to ensure support from grass roots and voters at their respective constituencies. The all year round consistent campaigning throughout each constituency guarantees better results than a one-off GE campaign approach. This is particularly true in the modern world’s 24-hour news cycle, where politicians constantly jostle for media and public attention.

I feel that regardless the campaign period, both parties are not privy to the actual General Election dates (while it is true that in Malaysia, the incumbent Prime Minister has the upper hand due to his constitutional role in advising the Agong regarding the dissolution of Parliament, we know that even ruling party politicians play constant guessing games regarding the exact timing of polls). Hence, it is in the interest of both parties (ruling and opposition) to identify winnable candidates and strengthening their grassroots support through regular campaigning. I believe both sides are working equally hard at the grass root level to gain support.

In short, Bersih organizers and supporters should not view the campaign period as a key determining factor to ensure fair elections. Again, they have deceived the public and caused unnecessary anger.

5. Free and fair access to media

It is no secret that the Malaysian mainstream media fails to practice proportionate, fair and objective reporting for political parties of all divide. Bersih 2.0 calls on the EC to press for all media agencies, especially state-funded media agencies such as Radio and Television Malaysia (RTM) and Bernama to allocate proportionate and objective coverage for all political parties.

RESPONSE:

I feel this is a lob-sided request by Bersih 2.0. Free and fair access to media has been a hot topic of debate since Tun Mahathir’s time. At the same time, we are aware of the existence of alternative media which provide differing views which are sometimes being perceived as unfairly critical of one side or the other.

Lets look at some facts.

According to ITU (United Nation specialized agency for ICT), Malaysia has 17 million internet users in 2010. According to Nielsen research in 2010, newspaper in Malaysia has approximately 15 million readership (54% of population).

Malaysiakini recorded 1 million visitor in January 2011. For one year, it is estimated the total visitor is around 12 million people. And remember, we have other online news portal such as Malaysia Insider, Malaysia Reserve, etc.

On another data by Malaysian Digital Association (MDA) in April 2011, Malaysiakini recorded higher number of unique visitors at 2.7 million compared to the Star online at 2.4 million.

Therefore, if you compare the mainstream news vis-à-vis the alternative / online media, the equal number of visitors/ readers for both shows equal playing field if you want to view it politically. Why Bersih is making a big fuss out of this ?

Another strong point to note is that the Government does not ban or censor Malaysiakini, Malaysian Insider or any other internet portals must be viewed as a significant step compared to other countries. Despite much provocation from opposition-leaning portals, the Malaysian government has kept to its commitment of free and open Internet since the launching of the Multimedia Super Corridor, and I think the Government deserves a bit more credit for not emulating China in this regard.

In recent times, we have seen the birth of “invisible & anonymous online cybertroopers” whose job is to consistently post negative comments on any article that appear in various Internet portals.

Whilst we all know that these are either planned or posted by a small handful of individuals, we have not witnessed any censorship from the Government on the strings of unintelligent and provocative postings, including comments relating and blaming everything on the present Government.

The silent majority knows that most of the comments posted online at Malaysia Kini and Malaysia Insider are fabricated / scripted by certain quarters. Postings / ramblings such as “Hidup Pakatan”, “Wait for the next GE”, “Lets vote PR”, “Government bodoh”, etc are “recycled” and appeared in different articles.

If we want to scrutinize further, Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider journalists have the tendency to post a negative title to capture the attention of the readers/ visitors. This makes certain quarters feel that the online-media are pro opposition.

So to sum it all, both political parties have equal playing field judging from the number of readers/visitors for both mainstream and alternative media. To allow fair reporting for all political parties, my view is that Bersih 2.0 must also call for the EC to ensure that online media such as Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider practice proportionate, fair and balanced reporting.

6. Strengthen public institutions

Public institutions must act independently and impartially in upholding the rule of law and democracy. Public institutions such as the Judiciary, Attorney-General, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC), Police and the EC must be reformed to act independently, uphold laws and protect human rights. In particular, the EC must perform its constitutional duty to act independently and impartially so as to enjoy public confidence. The EC cannot continue to claim that they have no power to act, as the law provides for sufficient powers to institute a credible electoral system.

RESPONSE:

I fail to comprehend how Bersih 2.0 can make this call for “reform” of the institutions mentioned, when the Government has been doing precisely this for several years now, beginning with the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysian Police, the establishment of the Judicial Appointments Commission, as well as the establishment of the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission.

In other words, the transformation of various national institutions is an ongoing process. And so, rather than continuing to lambast and ridicule vital institutions of the state such as the MACC and the police, I suggest that the Opposition and their friends in Bersih 2.0 should start being more productive and suggest concrete measures to transform our institutions for the better.

This is especially true for the Elections Commission. Other than continued calls from the Opposition for the EC to “report to Parliament” (what does that mean, anyway? Who is Parliament should they report to? How would reporting to a committee made up of squabbling politicians be any improvement from the current way that the EC is established?), we have not heard any specific and concrete measures to improve the EC.

Stop hiding behind vague rhetorical statements, and try to be more specific and concrete about what changes you propose to make.

7. Stop corruption

Corruption is a disease that has infected every aspect of Malaysian life. BERSIH 2.0 and the rakyat demand for an end to all forms of corruption. Current efforts to eradicate corruption are mere tokens to appease public grouses. We demand that serious action is taken against ALL allegations of corruption, including vote buying.

RESPONSE:

I agree and support Bersih 2.0’s call for war on Corruption. I am totally behind this as no one likes or condones corrupt practices in this country.

It took me several days to study this in greater depth and looking at what the present Government is doing vis-à-vis other countries. I am very passionate to share my findings with my fellow Malaysians who are there in KL raving about corruption.

My view can be simplified as follow.

Fighting corruption is an on-going battle, and I believe each country have to come up with preventive measures to curb corruption. When I looked at developed countries like Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States, it took them more than 10 years to fight corruption to a level where it is acceptable by global standards.

One of my ex-colleague is in a top 3 global investment bank and she had the opportunity to sit in to listen to the Government Transformation Programme (GTP as popularly known in Malaysia) update during an analyst roadshow in Singapore and Hong Kong. From her discussion with many other analyst, Malaysia has placed a number of significant game changer initiatives to prevent corruption and this is clearly reflect in the GTP annual report (which I’m told can be downloaded for free).

As this most hotly debated topic in Malaysia, I did some research on the web to get a better understand on what she meant by “significant game changer initiatives”.

For the first time, a Whistle Blower Act has been gazetted and now every Malaysians can submit a case and his/her identity will be protected. This is something new for all of us in Malaysia.

Next was the announcement of 18 corruption courts expedite corruption cases so that swift action can be taken. I think this is a brilliant idea! Not many countries have this.

From the MACC website, I found out more than 800 people have been arrested for corruption in 2010 alone. And 200 + confirmed cases have been published on the MACC website with names, IC number and photographs. This is indeed a significant milestones for this country if you ask me. I think we are following closely the Hong Kong model. For the record, ICAC of Hong Kong do publish the statistics of the convicted cases on their website.

I also managed to check how transparent the Government is in publishing the government award contracts, I have found this website called MyProcurement. Quite rough but it fits the purpose of listing more than 3,000 government award contracts. Not bad if you think about it.

Overall, although more can be said about Malaysia’s effort in fighting corruption, I feel Malaysia in the recent time has made leaps and bounds to build preventive measures.

At the end of the day, the corruption case may not reduce to zero overnight, but as a Malaysian, we have to give some credit on MACC’s effort.

Coming back to Bersih 2.0. Yes, I do support this demand/request by them. In fact, Bersih should work with the Government to bring the corruption cases along with the evidence forward as they have 18 corruption courts to expedite the matter. Anyone can make vague and unsubstantiated claims about corruption. Why Bersih 2.0 did not bring forward actual corrupt cases and work with MACC or EC remains unclear.

So Bersih should stop riding on this demand knowing the fact that Malaysia is doing everything they possibly can to fight corruption. In fact, stop being rhetoric about such pronouncement of intent. Rather, please work with MACC and bring solid corruption cases ! The public at large are sick of talk and debating about rhetoric stuff and all we need is to bring more corruption cases forward!

8. Stop dirty politics

Malaysians are tired of dirty politics that has been the main feature of the Malaysian political arena. We demand for all political parties and politicians to put an end to gutter politics. As citizens and voters, we are not interested in gutter politics; we are interested in policies that affect the nation.

RESPONSE

If there is one demand from Bersih 2.0 that I like, then this will be it. We must stop dirty politics on both sides.

Politics in Malaysia is still at infancy stage. Fact based argument is often twisted to inject doubt in the society. Racial sentiments are always played to spark racial divide. Personal allegation and remarks between political leaders are often chosen as the best method as opposed to fact based arguments or healthy intellectual debate.

If you look in the last 10 years, the existence of a digital community has changed the landscape on how we think and altered our perception on they how we view a particular subject. More predominantly when everyone can express themselves through a combination of facts, fiction, lies and emotions on the web (i.e blogs, online media), then things start to change. This is coupled with the existence of “invisible cyber troopers” (from both sides) starting to post comments on negative things about this country.

Slowly but surely most of us in Malaysia are now blaming the Government’s education system for our kids’ lack of achievement despite given scholarship, good residential schools, etc. We blame the Government for the high cost of living despite having the lowest interest rate for car loans, property loans, etc. We blame the Government for not giving the rakyat enough subsidy despite being one of the most highly subsidized countries in the world. We blame the Government for not having sufficient investors into the country despite our Bursa Malaysia reaching 6 times record high in 2011 alone, etc.

I hope we do not come to a stage where we blame the Government for climate change too.

On the statement by Bersih 2.0 on “ we are interested in policies that affect the nation”, I managed to do a quick research about the Government Transformation Programme and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that the Najib administration talked about. After hours of research and reading, I almost fainted to count the number of articles and report from financial analyst/economists around the world on the national transformation agenda. Whether it has impact or not, one thing for sure the stock market in Malaysia has record high at 1580 points in 2011. That excludes that the fact the our stock Market has reach at least 5 times record high in 6 months of 2011 !

I mean, on one hand we demand “policies that affect the nation”, one one hand we forgot about the very achievements which are taking place infront of our eyes.

Dear fellow Malaysians, reading and observing how we act as a country, for a homogenous society, we need to embrace and forgive our differences.

We should be grateful. Malaysia is blessed with so many positive things surrounding us vis-à-vis our neighbouring country.

Each of us have a role to play.

Rallying and street demonstration doesn’t guarantee a better future.

Let’s stop the bickering and dirty politics.

Let’s focus on building this country together.

source : jebatmustdie