NUFFNANG

Sunday, 31 May 2020

Bersatu Armada reiterates policy matters on leaving Pakatan must be deci...

Syed Saddiq cautions Bersatu president about Hamzah

Syed Saddiq: They continue their scheme of things with or without Dr M

Polemik Dalaman BERSATU: apa kata Hanif Kathri?

[��SIRI 61��] "EDISI KHAS: ISU KEMELUT DALAMAN PARTI BERSATU"

Bersatu bakal pecat Dr M? Tak masuk akal, kata Akhramsyah

Dr M: I'm still Bersatu chairman, remember that

Siri kedua pendedahan rakaman audio mesyuarat MPT Bersatu

Party elections will decide who leads Bersatu, says Dr M

Bersatu bakal pecat Dr M? Tak masuk akal, kata Akhramsyah

Kita sedang diuji dengan kuasa, pesan Muhyiddin pada PPBM

Jamal derma RM7 billion kepada PPBM

[Facts and truth hurts ... coming from dap ...] ...Ex-deputy minister rues missed opportunity by Umno to reform itself

Ex-deputy minister rues missed opportunity by Umno 

to reform itself

Liew Chin Tong speaks to reporters in Putrajaya April 24, 2019. — Picture by Mukhriz Hazim
Liew Chin Tong speaks to reporters in Putrajaya April 24, 2019. — Picture by Mukhriz Hazim
KUALA LUMPUR, May 30 — The stranglehold of former Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak on the party has proven to be a great missed opportunity for Umno to allow people like deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan and former Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin to rise and cleanse the party of corrupt leaders.
Johor DAP chief Liew Chin Tong shared this today in a lengthy opinion piece, in which he said all that was needed to be done by such individuals was to apologise to the nation for Umno’s past sins and plead for a fresh start.
“With the new blood and recasting of its messaging, Umno has a chance to win back the people’s support in a free and fair general election,” he wrote.
Instead, Liew said Mohamad and Khairy appear to have allowed Najib to call the shots, blaming the former prime minister for being a part of a ‘scorched earth’ political strategy by fanning racial hatred to make things ungovernable for Pakatan Harapan (PH).
Throughout the piece, the former deputy defence minister in the PH administration drew comparisons to the Umno of old and as it exists now, noting that the party had many strong points in the past which made it appealing to so many.
He cited Umno’s reputation as a rural party par excellence whose former leaders had a developmental goal, evident in the decent infrastructure seen in some rural areas in Johor, including pre-schools, healthcare, education and public amenities.
Yet the development of infrastructure may have backfired on the party, as Liew claimed it made many working adults leave their kampung to work in Johor Baru, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, where they were exposed to the harsh realities of life including the weaknesses of the Barisan Nasional government.
“Umno used to represent social mobility for the Malays, but now it is seen as an elitist party. At least until the 1990s, social mobility was the key message of the party for the community.
“When rural baby boomers began to look for jobs in the early 1970s, export-led industrialisation was pursued relentlessly and many had their lives transformed positively. Some even rose to join the life of the middle class. Opportunities for higher education were also provided for many, though not all,” he said.
In comparison, following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and the subsequent economic stagnation in the past 20 years, Liew said this has disillusioned many as a result, especially due to wages that have plateaued.
“The increasing gap between the rich and poor Malays, especially between the Umnoputras and the rest, is fuelling very serious intra-ethnic resentment against the Umno elites and provoking repulsion against the party leaders known to be corrupt,” he said.
Similarly, Umno was also acceptable to middle-ground non-Malay voters up until 2005, when Liew said the party “burned its bridges”.
“Since Independence (of Malaya in 1957), Umno had never contested under its own logo. It was always the symbol of the Alliance, and later Barisan Nasional, until the by-elections after 2018.
“The modus operandi of the coalition was simple — as long as Umno and its coalition partners can win more than half of the votes of all ethnic groups, no one would be able to challenge the supremacy of BN,” he said.
Liew also pointed out then-prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s Bangsa Malaysia concept unveiled in early 1991 as being BN’s strong point in winning the general elections of 1995, 1999 and 2004.
However, following Dr Mahathir’s retirement in 2003, the Johor DAP chief said Umno took a wrong turn by turning right politically in 2005. As a result, it is hard to imagine non-Malays voting for a highly racialised Umno in the last 15 years, and in the context of competitive Malay-majority mixed seats, having non-Malay support is very crucial.
Looking at the party in 2020, he said Umno’s position is precarious since it is no longer the ruling party under the current Perikatan Nasional government led by Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
“Since the change of government for the first time ever in 2018, the public knows that they can vote out any party, including Umno, without fear. The government machinery, including the civil service, knows that the rule of law now is being upheld slightly better than before.
“Top civil servants also know that should there be any funny business, they may be answerable if there is another change of government. From time to time, ousted former ruling parties do come back to power through election with a new set of leaders, especially when they learned their lesson and reformed their party,” Liew said.
However, Umno remains stuck with the ill-gotten gains obtained by Najib via 1MDB and other scandals, with the party structure after the 14th general election still very much controlled by Najib.
“The disgraced prime minister knew this, continuing to play dumb like a spoiled rich kid that he is, to the delight of his staunch supporters. It may be too late for Najib to escape punishment for his involvement in the 1MDB mega scandal as well as his kleptocracy, but he is still trying to find a way to survive.
“The purpose of the racial hatred campaign was to cause the collapse of Pakatan Harapan government so that a new configuration could be engineered in which a friendlier government would be more benign to Najib’s personal interests,” he said.
As such, the situation has become a sad one for Umno, as Liew said its leaders missed kickstarting a reform agenda since they are comfortable with the old ways of doing things.
“For the benefit of Najib’s personal interest, some Umno leaders, including a few of Bersatu turncoats, have squandered the chance to return to power through winning the middle ground.
“I admit that if a general election is held today, those who voted for Najib might continue to support him, as no other Umno leader is holding on to that base as firmly as he is. That is how bad the situation is in Umno, controlled from outside by someone who has the money,” he said.
Yet not everything is doom and gloom as Liew said the middle ground is now an open political vacuum waiting to be filled, a path pointing towards a more sincere understanding and tolerance among Malaysians.
source : malaymail

Bersatu Pontian sokong Tun M

Bersatu Pontian sokong Tun M

30 MAY 2020
Bersatu Pontian sokong Tun M
BERITA SEMASA 30 MEI 2020
Bersatu Pontian, Johor menyatakan sokongan terhadap Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dan kesal dengan pemecatan yang dibuat terhadapnya dan empat lagi pemimpin tertinggi parti itu, lapor wartawan Sinar Harian, Nor Azura Md 

[komen veteran pas ...] ... Kedudukan PN, Muhyiddin sukar diramal

Kedudukan PN, Muhyiddin sukar diramal
MOHD AZLIM ZAINURY
31 MAY 2020
SHAH ALAM - Kedudukan politik Perikatan Nasional (PN) di bawah pimpinan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin masih belum teruji dan sukar diramal sepenuhnya, kata veteran Pas, Datuk Mustafa Ali.
Mustafa yang juga Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Penasihat Pas berkata, kemampuan PN untuk terus bertahan sehingga Pilihan Raya Umum ke-15 (PRU15) juga masih terlalu awal untuk diramal.
"Beginilah, kedudukan (PN) saya sebut secara umum. Di mana proses-proses politik ini masih sedang bergerak di Malaysia ini, satu kedudukan yang memang tidak begitu stabil. Jadi kita kena tunggu lagi, perkembangan masih berjalan, dinamika politik ini masih berterusan dan tiada siapa boleh menjangka secara pasti apa yang boleh berlaku, boleh jadi macam-macam.
"PN ini masih baharu dan belum diuji sepenuhnya sama ada mampu atau tidak PN bertahan sehingga PRU15 juga bergantung kepada proses yang sedang berjalan ketika ini," katanya kepada Sinar Harian.
Beliau berkata demikian ketika ditanya sama ada kemelut melanda Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) antara Muhyiddin dan Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mampu mempengaruhi kestabilan PN.
Mengulas lanjut, Mustafa berkata, beliau tidak mengikuti secara dekat mengenai urusan dalaman Bersatu, namun berpandangan proses politik yang tidak stabil mampu memberi kesan kepada kerajaan PN.
Terdahulu, Dr Mahathir yang mendakwa dirinya masih Pengerusi Bersatu bersama empat lagi pemimpin dipecat keahliannya daripada parti itu.
Empat yang lain ialah Timbalan Presiden Bersatu, Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir; Ketua Armada Bersatu, Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman; Ahli Majlis Pimpinan Tertinggi (MPT), Dr Maszlee Malik serta Ahli Parlimen Kubang Pasu, Datuk Amiruddin Hamzah.
Berdasarkan surat yang diedarkan kepada media sebelum ini, kelima-lima mereka dipecat atas alasan duduk di bangku pembangkang ketika persidangan pembukaan Dewan Rakyat pada 18 Mei lalu.
Semalam, Setiausaha Agung Bersatu, Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin turut menjelaskan bahawa bekas Perdana Menteri itu bukan lagi pengerusi parti itu.
Sebaliknya, keahlian Ahli Parlimen Langkawi itu terhenti selepas beberapa tindakan yang dilakukan oleh Dr Mahathir dilihat telah melanggar perlembagaan parti.
Source : sinarharian

[PANASSSS!!!...] ... Malaysia memilih semula

Malaysia memilih semula

AB JALIL BACKER
31 MAY 2020
GELORA politik yang berlaku beberapa hari lepas menunjukkan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyidin Yassin mempunyai pilihan yang sangat terhad untuk menstabilkan kerajaan.
Selepas sidang Parlimen sehari 18 Mei lalu, Pakatan Harapan (PH) mendakwa mereka kini mempunyai majoriti mudah untuk membentuk kerajaan baharu. Dakwaan itu walaupun belum dibuktikan secara tuntas, namun telah membuka polemik yang berterusan.
Sebarang perubahan tiga orang ahli Parlimen blok kerajaan sahaja akan menyebabkan Perdana Menteri kehilangan sokongan majoriti. Sedikit sahaja masalah dan pertikaian dalam blok kerajaan akan menyebabkan kerajaan ini tumbang.
Pembentangan belanjawan tambahan dan pakej rangsangan ekonomi yang sepatutnya dibentangkan Mei lalu ditangguh atas sebab Covid-19 juga boleh digagalkan dalam sidang Dewan Rakyat Julai 2020 nanti.
Peristiwa politik beberapa hari lalu adalah satu contoh terbaik bagaimana menguruskan kerajaan hari ini tidak ubah seperti proses rundingan tebusan.
Apabila Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mendakwa PH mempunyai sokongan majoriti, Bersatu mengambil keputusan ‘memecat’ keahlian lima ahli Parlimennya.
Dr Mahathir, Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir, Datuk Amiruddin Hamzah, Dr Maszlee Malik dan Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman ditamatkan keahlian.
Sehari kemudian Dr Mahathir mencabar pemecatan tersebut dengan hadir ke ibu pejabat Bersatu. Dalam masa yang sama tersebar berita seorang Menteri dan beberapa Timbalan Menteri akan meletak jawatan.
Walaupun berita tersebut kemudiannya menjadi khabar angin, namun wujud tanda-tanda jelas proses rundingan belakang tabir telah berlaku. Ada sesi memujuk dan menawarkan pilihan yang ‘lebih baik’ telah berlangsung.
Selepas kegagalan sidang akhbar seorang ‘menteri’ tersebut diadakan, keadaan mungkin akan tenang seketika. Namun ancaman terhadap kestabilan kerajaan akan berterusan.
Sebenarnya dalam keadaan pandemik sekarang kita memerlukan pengorbanan semua pemimpin politik terutama ahli Parlimen untuk menggunakan hak-hak mereka secara waras dan bertolak ansur buat sementara waktu. Malangnya kewarasan sebahagian ahli Parlimen bukan pilihan. Justeru, pilihan Muhyiddin sangat terhad.
Pertama, beliau boleh cuba menambah sokongan ahli Parlimen kepada kerajaan sedia ada. Untuk menstabilkan kerajaan ini, Muhyiddin memerlukan sokongan antara 120-125 orang ahli Parlimen sebelum sidang Dewan Rakyat akan datang.
Tanpa penambahan sokongan ahli Parlimen, Muhyiddin berjalan atas titian yang sangat rapuh. Sebarang ‘ketidakhadiran’ atau ‘keingkaran’ beberapa orang ahli Parlimen blok kerajaan boleh menyebabkan usul perbelanjaan tambahan kerajaan akan gagal.
Jika ini berlaku maka Muhyiddin tiada pilihan kecuali memaklumkan kepada Yang di-Pertuan Agong bahawa beliau telah hilang sokongan majoriti dan memohon pembubaran Parlimen.
Pilihan kedua ialah membubarkan Parlimen pada penghujung tahun ini. Jika pun kerajaan melepasi cabaran Dewan Rakyat Julai nanti, isu perubahan sokongan ini akan sentiasa menjadi duri dalam daging kepada Muhyiddin.
Sebahagian orang mungkin tidak bersetuju dengan pilihan raya baharu berikutan pandemik Covid-19. Namun kestabilan kerajaan juga penting bagi memulihkan ekonomi dalam jangka masa panjang.
Korea Selatan telah menjalankan PRU mereka pada April lalu dengan jayanya tanpa sebarang kes jangkitan Covid-19.
Mungkin sudah tiba masanya Malaysia memilih semula.
* Abd Jalil Backer ialah Presiden Angkatan Karyawan Nasional (Akar)

Sumber : sinarharian

[Artikel menarik!...] ... Kerajaan berhutang kepada kita

Kerajaan berhutang kepada kita

A KADIR JASIN
31 MAY 2020
DARI masa ke masa, timbul bahas mengenai kedudukan kewangan negara khususnya sama ada kerajaan ada duit atau tidak.
Baru-baru ini apabila Menteri Kewangan, Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz kata kedudukan fiskal Malaysia kukuh, adalah orang yang tuduh Menteri Kewangan dulu, Lim Guan Eng bohong pasal dia pernah kata kerajaan tak ada duit.
Masalahnya, banyak orang yang dengar berita macam itu dan kemudian buat kesimpulan sebenarnya tak pun faham hal sebenar. Perkara-perkara yang bersangkut paut dengan kewangan ini rumit dan boleh dinilai daripada banyak sudut.
Memang benar kedudukan kewangan negara kita kukuh macam Tengku Zafrul kata. Tapi Guan Eng pun tak salah bila dia kata kerajaan tak ada duit. Ini kerana mereka bercakap melalui sudut yang berbeza.
Betul kata Tengku Zafrul bahawa kedudukan kewangan negara kukuh. Kalau dikira semua duit yang ada dalam sistem kewangan, kita sebenarnya ada duit yang banyak.
Ini kerana ekonomi kita lebih baik daripada kebanyakan negara di dunia dan daripada awal lagi kerajaan galak dan paksa rakyat simpan duit.
Kita simpan duit secara sukarela dalam bank atau melalui pelaburan macam Amanah Saham Bumiputera, Bursa Malaysia dan Tabung Haji.
Kita juga simpan secara wajib melalui caruman kepada tabung-tabung pencen macam Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja (KWSP), Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT) bagi anggota tentera dan Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (KWAP).
Jadi memang betullah bila orang kata sistem kewangan kita kukuh. Maksudnya negara kita ada duit. Tapi duit itu bukan duit kerajaan dan kerajaan tak boleh guna sesuka hati.
Duit kerajaan sendiri tak banyak, hanya ada apa yang dikutip daripada orang ramai dan syarikat perniagaan dalam bentuk cukai, yuran, denda dan seumpamanya. Kemudian sedikit daripada sumbar pelaburan seperti Petronas dan Khazanah Nasional Berhad.
Itu pun apa yang dikutip setiap tahun tak cukup untuk memenuhi keperluan perbelanjaan kerajaan. Kutipan itu hanya cukup untuk bayar gaji dan pencen kakitangan awam, selenggara pentadbiran dan bayar balik hutang.
Untuk bangunkan negara macam bina sekolah, hospital, prasarana dan beli kelengkapan tentera, kerajaan terpaksa berhutang. Daripada siapa kerajaan berhutang? Daripada kita semua. Kebanyakan kita tak pun tahu yang kerajaan berhutang daripada kita.
Inilah kepelikan pentadbiran kewangan negara. Untuk bangunkan negara kononnya demi kebaikan kita rakyat jelata, kerajaan berhutang daripada rakyat jelata.
Kerajaan berhutang daripada kita dengan cara menjual surat jaminan dalam bentuk Bon Perbendaharaan. Bon itu dibeli oleh bank, KWSP, Permodalan Nasional Berhad (PNB), Tabung Haji, KWAP, LTAT dan bermacam-macam lagi badan pelaburan yang semuanya guna duit simpanan dan pelaburan kita.
Kesimpulannya, Tengku Zafrul betul bila dia kata, sistem kewangan dan percukaian negara kukuh. Ini kerana sistem kewangan kita ada banyak duit tapi duit itu duit kita, bukan duit kerajaan.
Guan Eng pun betul juga bila dia kata, kerajaan tak ada duit. Memang kerajaan tak ada duit atau tak cukup duit. Kerajaan terpaksa berhutang daripada kita, lepas itu pungut cukai daripada kita untuk bayar balik hutang daripada kita.
Sebab itulah saya selalu kata kita, khususnya orang Melayu, kena faham sikit sebanyak hal ekonomi. Kita tak boleh pandang ringan bila kerajaan menyeleweng dan rasuah. Duit yang mereka seleweng dan rasuah itu duit kita.
Ambil contoh duit RM4 bilion yang SRC International Sdn Bhd pinjam daripada KWAP. Duit KWAP itu duit pencen kakitangan awam.
SRC International ini asalnya anak syarikat 1MDB. Ia tak mampu bayar balik hutang KWAP sebab berniaga atas angin. Kerajaan kena bayar balik. Daripada mana kerajaan dapat duit? Daripada siapa lagi kalau bukan kita rakyat jelata yang bayar cukai.
Duit yang kerajaan bagi dalam bentuk Bantuan Sara Hidup dan sebagainya itu bukan duit derma Tok Arab atau duit ibu duit tapi setiap sen adalah duit cukai yang kita sendiri bayar.
Wallahuaklam.
* A Kadir Jasin ialah Tokoh Wartawan Negara

source : sinarharian

Leaked audio reveals 'Muhyiddin entrusting Dr M' to decide on Harapan exit

Najib pecat Muhyiddin dengan anggukan

PPBM Muar sebulat suara tolak ‘pemecatan’ Syed Saddiq

PPBM Muar sebulat suara tolak ‘pemecatan’ Syed Saddiq


Bekas menteri belia dan sukan Syed Saddiq Syed Abd Rahman.
PETALING JAYA: Retak mula kelihatan dalam PPBM berikutan keputusan bahagian parti itu di Muar menolak “pemecatan” ketuanya Syed Saddiq Syed Abd Rahman.
Bekas menteri belia dan sukan itu adalah antara 5 ahli Parlimen PPBM yang lucut keahlian secara automatik pada Khamis kerana duduk di kerusi blok pembangkang semasa persidangan Dewan Rakyat pada 18 Mei lepas.
Turut lucut keahlian ialah bekas perdana menteri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, anaknya Mukhriz, Amiruddin Hamzah dan Maszlee Malik.
Dalam satu kenyataan bersama oleh 21 ahli jawatankuasa bahagian itu, PPBM Muar berkata, ia sebulat suara menolak pemecatan Syed Saddiq kerana beliau tidak diberikan peluang untuk membela diri kepada lembaga disiplin parti.
Kenyataan itu berkata, keputusan menolak pemecatan tersebut dibuat dalam mesyuarat yang diadakan hari ini.
“PPBM Muar sebulat suara menolak pemecatan ketua bahagian, Syed Saddiq, dan memberi sokongan penuh kepada beliau.
Mereka juga berkata, krisis dalam PPBM hendak diselesaikan melalui pemilihan parti.
“Parti adalah milik ahli, bukan milik beberapa orang.”
Semalam setiausaha agung PPBM Hamzah Zainuddin mempertahankan keputusan parti itu melucutkan keahlian Mahathir dan ahli Parlimen lain dengan berkata, ia selaras dengan perlembagaan parti dan kepentingan parti mengatasi kepentingan mana-mana individu.
Beliau berkata, berdasarkan peruntukan perlembagaan PPBM, keahlian mana-mana individu terlucut secara serta-merta sama ada kerana keluar parti atau berpaling tadah kepada parti lain.
source :fmt

Muar PPBM stands by Syed Saddiq after his sacking

Muar PPBM stands by Syed Saddiq after his sacking

417Shares
facebook sharing button 379
twitter sharing button 25
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button
21 PPBM Muar committee members declare full support for Syed Saddiq
PETALING JAYA: Cracks have begun to appear in PPBM after the division in Muar, Johor, rejected the sacking of Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman, who was head of the division.
Syed Saddiq, who is MP for Muar, was among four MPs from PPBM whose memberships were terminated by the party on Thursday night for sitting with opposition members at the Dewan Rakyat sitting on May 18.
The others were former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Mahathir’s son Mukhriz, Amiruddin Hamzah and Maszlee Malik.
A statement signed by 21 Muar division committee members said they unanimously rejected the sacking on the ground that Syed Saddiq was not given the chance to defend himself before the party’s disciplinary board.
The decision to stand by Syed Saddiq was made after a meeting held today, they said. “We are declaring our full support for our division leader, Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman.”
They also called for the current crisis in PPBM to be settled through party elections. “The party belongs to members, not to just a few.”
Yesterday, PPBM secretary-general Hamzah Zainudin defended the party’s decision to terminate the membership of Dr Mahathir Mohamad and four other MPs, saying it was in accordance with the party constitution as the interest of the party is above any individual.
He said the party’s constitution stated that membership would be immediately terminated if the members either leave the party or defect to another party.
source : fmt

Aide tells what Zahid said to Dr M on day of Sheraton move

Aide tells what Zahid said to Dr M on day of Sheraton move


The photo that has been circulating online, showing Mahathir at a meeting with leaders of six Malay-based political parties. (Facebook pic)
PETALING JAYA: A press secretary to Dr Mahathir Mohamad has shed some light on a meeting the former prime minister had with several political leaders on the day of the “Sheraton Move” that led to the fall of the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government.
The aide, Adam Mukhriz Mohd Muhayeedin, posted some remarks about a photograph that has been circulating, which shows Mahathir at a meeting on Feb 23 attended by leaders of six Malay-based political parties.
Those seen in the photo are PPBM president Muhyiddin Yassin, Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang, Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) chairman Abang Johari Openg, Warisan president Shafie Apdal, PKR’s then deputy president, Mohamed Azmin Ali, and GPS chief whip Fadillah Yusof.
Adam Mukhriz said the party leaders had gathered after a meeting of the PPBM Supreme Council, at which the party’s leaders had agreed to give Mahathir a week to decide on the party’s direction.
“It was at this time that Zahid brought Tun some documents, as though to show that he was not guilty (of corruption charges), Adam Mukhriz wrote in a Facebook posting. “Tun Mahathir replied, ‘What are you showing this to me for? Give it to the court and let the court decide’.”
Adam said Mahathir had also told the various party leaders that there was no need to seek an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, and that he did not want to join their meeting at Sheraton that night.
The following day, Mahathir resigned as prime minister.
The picture has been circulating online with a claim that Mahathir had wanted Malay political leaders to be reunited, and that Mahathir had never mentioned not wanting to work en bloc with Umno.
source : fmt

Saturday, 30 May 2020

[MUST READ ARTICLE!!...]...BOMBSHELL – POWER SNATCH-BACK ANYTIME NOW – MAHATHIR COMES OUT FIGHTING, MUHYIDDIN HIDES BEHIND ‘QUARANTINE’, ANWAR PLAYS ‘STABILIZER’: IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHEN MAHATHIR & ANWAR DECIDE TO STRIKE – AS MALAYS LOSE ALL RESPECT FOR ‘OPPORTUNISTIC TRAITOR’ MUHYIDDIN – HIS BERSATU CAMP IS FINISHED BUT MAHATHIR STILL HAS THE SUPPORT OF 17 MPs


BOMBSHELL 

– POWER SNATCH-BACK ANYTIME NOW – MAHATHIR COMES OUT FIGHTING, MUHYIDDIN HIDES BEHIND ‘QUARANTINE’, ANWAR PLAYS ‘STABILIZER’: IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHEN MAHATHIR & ANWAR DECIDE TO STRIKE – AS MALAYS LOSE ALL RESPECT FOR ‘OPPORTUNISTIC TRAITOR’ MUHYIDDIN – HIS BERSATU CAMP IS FINISHED BUT MAHATHIR STILL HAS THE SUPPORT OF 17 MPs


 sack him.   
    illegally
 “legally and properly” 
Mahathir Sacked by Muhyiddin from Bersatu PPBM Party
    
  coward’s way 
   
Mahathir Sits With Opposition Bloc - May 18 Parliament Session
  did not quit  
  “switch support”.
   tradition 
Mahathir Mohamad and Anwar Ibrahim - Pakatan Harapan
 freedom of association   
  “does not exist”  
 quarantine  
Parliament - Muhyiddin Yassin - 1-Day Session
 consolidate   
  victimised
  contesting 
 buy support    
  fake image 
  thrives every time  
Muhyiddin Yassin - I Lover PM - Najib Razak
  old tiger  
    
   only won 13  
Najib Razak – Unexpectedly Lost 2018 General Election
   influence