NUFFNANG

Friday, 20 January 2023

Rafizi's message for BN in Selangor?

 

Rafizi's message for BN in Selangor?

Story by Ahmad Mustakim Zulkifli • 5h ago
43

Apolitical observer has played down the odds of Barisan 

Nasional (BN) receiving a bigger share of seats at the 

state election in Selangor this year, pointing to recent remarks

 by PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli despite BN's cooperation

 with Pakatan Harapan (PH) at the federal level. 

Rafizi's message for BN in Selangor?
Rafizi's message for BN in Selangor?© Provided by MalaysiaNow

Rafizi, the economy minister in Anwar Ibrahim's Cabinet, had 

said that PH was on comfortable footing in 40 of the 56 state 

seats in Selangor. 


Speaking to MalaysiaNow, Azizi Safar said Rafizi's comments 

were a signal that PH would not give up those seats to BN. 


"His message is, PH can remain in power in Selangor even 

without working with Umno and BN," he said. 


Azizi, the former executive secretary for Penang BN, added 

that neither BN nor Umno had any bargaining chips with which 

to negotiate a bigger allocation of seats in Selangor, Malaysia's 

richest state. 


"In fact, Umno is in more need of the non-Malay support that 

usually goes to PH parties after being rejected by the Malays 

at the recent general election," he said. 


Led by its lynchpin party Umno, BN dominated the political scene 

from the country's independence until the coalition's historic loss 

at the 2018 general election. 


Its worst election performance yet came at the Nov 19 polls 

last year, where it won just 30 parliamentary seats against PH's 

81 and Perikatan Nasional's (PN) 74. 

Related video: Selangor BN won’t have bargaining power in seat 

talks, says analyst (Dailymotion)

It nevertheless became part of the federal government by joining 

hands with its long-time foe PH, along with several other coalitions 

and parties. 


With six state-level elections looming this year, in Penang, Kedah,

Kelantan, Terengganu, Selangor and Negeri Sembilan, it is widely 

expected to work towards a similar understanding in order to 

weather the polls. 


In Selangor, PH has formed the state government for three terms 

since wresting it for the first time in 2008, under the then Pakatan 

Rakyat pact.


PH and BN joined hands for the first time in Pahang and Perak, 

as well as at the federal level, in the aftermath of the 15th general 

election (GE15). 


Analyst Kartini Aboo Talib of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 

said Rafizi was known for his political predictions. 


"Sometimes they're on the dot, but quite often they aren't," she 

said. 


"He didn't expect PN to win so many seats at GE15, or the Malays'

 rejection of BN and PH." 


Kartini said Rafizi's latest views appeared to be a tactic to encourage 

voters ahead of the state election.

 

She nevertheless recalled the political system in Anwar's coalition 

government, where all parties are expected to work together.

 

"Otherwise, they risk Umno and BN pulling their support for PH at 

the federal level," she said. 


Azizi however said the likelihood of this happening was small as 

Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi would not want to lose 

his position of deputy prime minister. 


source : msn

‘Showman’ Shafee’s ‘obnoxious conduct’ gave courts ‘fatigue’, says Zaid

 

‘Showman’ Shafee’s ‘obnoxious conduct’ gave courts ‘fatigue’, 

says Zaid

Story by FMT Reporters • 1h ago
2

PETALING JAYA: Zaid Ibrahim has called for Shafee 

Abdullah to “have some respect for truth” in his quest 

to get justice for Najib Razak.

Zaid Ibrahim (left) says it was Shafee Abdullah’s incompetency that led to Najib Razak suffering repeated losses in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.
Zaid Ibrahim (left) says it was Shafee Abdullah’s incompetency that led to Najib Razak suffering repeated losses in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.© Provided by Free Malaysia Today

“It is very sad for me if these accusations by Shafee yesterday 

are supported by Najib. I don’t know. He must have agreed 

to this narrative. Otherwise, why would Shafee raise that in 

open court?” Zaid said.


In comments posted on Facebook, he said the reason why 

Najib encountered problems in his SRC International case 

was probably due to the “somewhat obnoxious conduct of Shafee”.

“I think the court suffers from Shafee fatigue, and that is why 

Najib needed to change lawyers … so that the judges will be 

willing to listen, and the judges will be willing to look at the 

applications seriously,” he said.


The senior lawyer was responding to what he described as 

a “scathing attack” made by Shafee at the hearing of Najib’s 

bid yesterday to secure a review by the Federal Court of its 

decision to affirm the former prime minister’s conviction and 

sentence in the SRC International corruption case.


Shafee had claimed that Zaid’s firm, Zaid Ibrahim Suflan TH 

Liew & Partners, had not practised criminal law, and was not 

equipped to handle complicated cases such as the one Najib 

was facing.


He also said Zaid’s firm had assured Najib that the Federal Court 

would give them reasonable time to prepare for the appeal proper.


However, Zaid denied this, saying that Najib’s camp experienced 

a “sense of desperation and concern” after suffering repeated 

losses in the High Court and the Court of Appeal in the build-up 

to the Federal Court appeal.


“They asked for my views, and so I said, it was Shafee’s 

incompetency that led to these difficulties.

“It you want a different outcome at the last stage, which is at 

the Federal Court, you have to remove Shafee. And I said so 

in all honesty.

“You see, Shafee is a good showman. He is not a good lawyer. 

His approach is scattergun. He was talking about political 

conspiracy with no evidence,” he said.


Related video: Incompetence of Najib's previous counsel 

tainted final appeal, Shafee tells court (Dailymotion)

According to Zaid, Shafee’s “scattergun” approach was 

“the crux of (Najib’s) problem”, and that a change of approach 

was needed.

“I told the team that to attack Nazlan’s credibility or integrity

(was) stupid, because Nazlan is a man of integrity and there 

is no evidence that he took money or anything like that,” Zaid 

said, referring to Court of Appeal judge Nazlan Mohd Ghazali.


The former law minister said the issue with Nazlan was that 

he was involved in 1MDB when he was working with Maybank.


“That could be a problem in the sense of a conflict of interest. 

That’s all we could pick on him,” he said.

He said he went on to assemble a team that included Indian 

advocates with vast experience in the Indian Penal Code 

and its money laundering laws, which were similar to Malaysia’s.


“We brought these lawyers to see Najib, and Najib at that 

time was convinced that the (only) way to go about it (was) 

to abandon Shafee.


“Of course, Shafee was furious. He even refused to hand 

over the files until we got Najib to write a letter terminating 

his services. We took the letter to the courts,” he said.


Zaid said his team did a good job in reshaping Najib’s affidavit 

to remove allegations accusing Nazlan of bribery and 

impropriety, as well as allegations of political conspiracy.


“We narrowed it down to conflict of interests (and) to adducing 

additional evidence of Nazlan’s role when he was in Maybank. 

We thought that it was a legitimate issue to discuss at the Federal 

Court level,” he said.


He said his team’s services were terminated after they were 

denied what they thought was a “fair request” for adjournment.


“You cannot blame us. We did our best in (those) five weeks,” 

he said.

Najib, 69, filed for the review in September last year, shortly 

after the apex court affirmed his conviction for abuse of power, 

criminal breach of trust and money laundering in the SRC case.


On Aug 23, a five-member bench chaired by Chief Justice 

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat upheld his conviction and sentence 

of 12 years’ jail and a fine of RM210 million or, in default, an 

additional five years in prison.


Najib is asking for that decision to be set aside and for another 

Federal Court bench consisting of at least seven judges to 

rehear his appeal.


On Aug 16, before the hearing of the appeal proper, Najib 

saw a motion for leave to introduce additional evidence and 

disqualify trial judge Nazlan thrown out by the bench.


The court then refused his request for an adjournment to 

enable his new team of lawyers to prepare and argue the 

merits of his appeal.


Najib’s other complaint that Tengku Maimun ought not to 

have presided over the appeal on the grounds of purported 

bias was dismissed on Aug 23.


source : msn

[PANASS!!..]...TANDA-TANDA PH-BN RETAK, RASA TAK PUAS HATI TERHADAP ZAHID, UMNO