APA SALAHNYA HOMOSEXUAL MENJADI PERDANA MENTERI

APA SALAHNYA HOMOSEXUAL MENJADI PERDANA MENTERI






MAHARAJABLOGGER

Rakyat Permatang Pauh telah membuktikan bahawa walaupun mereka bermentaliti dunia ketiga tetapi mengamalkan demokrasi dunia kelas pertama dengan memilih Anwar Ibrahim untuk kembali ke Parlimen tanpa mempedulikan tuduhan liwat yang dihadapinya.

Beliau akan menghadapi tuduhan itu di mahakamah pada 16 September ini (dalam bulan puasa)sebelum mengangkat sumpah sebagai anggota Parlimen pada bulan Oktober.

Penasihat DAP Lim Kit Siang di dalam blognya telah pun menuduh Speaker Parlimen Pandikar Amin bersikap tidak adil melewatkan upacara angkat sumpah itu kerana beliau percaya jika calon BN , Amin Shah menang maka tentunya disegerakan upacara angkat sumpah kerana Pak Lah mahu menunjukan BN telah keluar dari tsunami politik yang menimpanya pada Mac lalu.

Lim Kit Siang telah membuat perkiraan Anwar sebagai anggota Parlimen akan lebih berkesan untuk menarik perhatian dunia dan juga mendapat sokongan politik dalam negara supaya tuduhan liwat terhadapnya digugurkan.Maka itu dia perlu segera mengangkat sumpah.

Jika berada di luar Parlimen pun beliau mampu menarik perhatian dunia terutama Amerika Syarikat maka apatahlagi setelah berada dalam Parlimen.Bagi Barat homosexual bukanlah jenayah.Menangkap dan menghukum orang yang mengamalkannya adalah di luar kemanusiaan.
Demikian juga kepada sebahagian guru guru pondok zaman dahulu.Liwat adalah perkara biasa atau mainan budak budak pondok.Maka itu Mursyidul Am Pas Nik Aziz tidak terkejut dengan cerita cerita sodomi atau liwat.

Tentunya atas fahaman tersebut juga orang Melayu dan bukan Melayu di Permatang Pauh telah memberikan undi kepada Anwar.Apakah perlu kita mengambil peduli tentang hal atau kesukaaan seseorang yang bersifat kehidupan peribadinya ?

Apakah semua anggota Parlimen Malaysia baik baik belaka,tidak terlibat dengan zina atau mengadakan hubungan sulit dengan isteri orang?. Jika orang seperti ini diterima sebagai wakil rakyat maka kenapa rakyat harus menetapkan nilai moral bagi seseorang untuk menjadi anggota Parlimen atau menjadi Perdana Menteri.

Apa salahnya seorang homosexual menjadi Perdana Menteri?

Masyarakat Malaysia sedang membuat penyesuaian dengan dasar baru demokrasi Malaysia yang menekankan kepada keterbukaan,ketelusan dan kebebasan.

Kemenangan Anwar Ibrahim menjelaskan betapa rakyat Malaysia telah jauh kehadapan dalam amalan demokrasi terutama hak hak individu.

Hasrat penasihat penasihat Perdana Menteri untuk membuktikan kepada dunia demokrasi Malaysia sekarang lebih baik dari era Mahathir telah mulai menampakan kejayaannya.Tetapi sayangnya demokrasi ini juga sedang menghakiskan pengaruh UMNO dan akan melenyapkan kerajaan Barisan Nasional di pilihanraya umum ke 13.

kzso - semoga ALLAH SWT melindungi negara tercinta kita ini.........

What is reform to Umno?

What is reform to Umno?

By Wan Hamidi Hamid, Political Editor

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 28 — Are Umno leaders on the same wavelength with the rest of the country over the issue of reform?

Among the many definitions of reform is to "make changes for improvement in order to remove abuse and injustices". This is what the opposition Pakatan Rakyat is propagating and this is also the call by some Umno allies in the Barisan Nasional.

However, from the top to the bottom of the Umno hierarchy, the cry of reform simply means to get rid of president Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and to strengthen the Ketuanan Melayu (Malay supremacy) agenda. No one is really serious about removing "abuse and injustices".

Although not many dare ask the Prime Minister to resign, those who do believe it can resolve the party's woes after the March 8 general election debacle. For them, without Abdullah, the party can move on with its Ketuanan Melayu agenda.

The problem with this is, with or without Abdullah, Umno top leaders must continue to promote the racial supremacy agenda, much to chagrin of BN component parties who believe that was the main reason for the massive losses in this year's elections.

Whether Abdulah's deputy Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak or vice-president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, or even an outside challenger such as Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah is the one to lead Umno, the problem remains the same.

With Parti Keadilan Rakyat de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's return to Parliament today, riding on a Ketuanan Rakyat (supremacy of the people) platform and a rejection of race politics, his popularity among the non-Malays — representing 40 per cent of the population — is on the rise.

Many of those who disliked Anwar in the past, especially when he was the deputy to then Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, have begun to evaluate his new political offerings. While the majority of the non-Malays are already getting closer to giving him their full support, the Malays too are beginning to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Initially many political pundits saw the support for the opposition in terms of a protest vote against BN. It was true for the March 8 political tsunami. It was to teach the "arrogant" BN leaders a lesson, some argued.

Almost six months later, even those loyal BN supporters who regretted voting for either PKR, Pas or DAP on March 8 have absolved themselves of such a sin. They see the Umno and BN leaders, although not all, have not learnt their lesson — they are still arrogant, uncouth and corruptible.

Now MCA and Gerakan leaders are allowing members to think aloud, saying that Umno must get rid of parochial race politics if it wants to continue cooperating with them. The two Chinese-dominated parties are being pressured by grassroots members who have seen that despite ideological differences, Pakatan Rakyat is based on equal partnership. BN component members are unhappy with the master-servant relationship, as described by some of their senior leaders.

But Umno is already trapped in its Ketuanan Melayu game.

Abdullah has tried to explain what it means — the Malays must strengthen themselves to be successful and developed, and it is not to dominate, rule over and force their power upon other races.

Unfortunately for the Umno president, his definition is not the one accepted by many top and low level leaders whose understanding is that Malay supremacy means the masters of the land, and no one should challenge, let alone question it.

The racial agenda has been translated into many forms of intimidation — at least in the eyes of the non-Malays and even some liberal Malays — such as threatening to take stern action against those who question Malay privileges and demanding the government provide more aid and assistance to the Malays at the expense of the multiracial taxpayers.

At the current meetings of Umno branches nationwide, despite a few calls for the Prime Minister to resign and for the party to abolish the quota nomination system for party polls, the Ketuanan Melayu bit has become a compulsory war cry.

At branch-level meetings, some are just race-baiting — the non-Malays will take over the country if the government stops giving the Malays more power, jobs, business and education opportunities and other perks.

The question is — if they take over the Umno leadership, can Najib, Muhyiddin or Tengku Razaleigh reform Umno to suit with the needs of all Malaysians? Or will the racial supremacy continue to reign to the detriment of Malaysia's multiracial society?

The Federal Constitution's provision for the Malays is to help the underprivileged and bring the Malays out of poverty. To promote racial supremacy and segregation is not constitutional.

This is the problem Umno leaders must resolve if they truly want a Bangsa Malaysia, as espoused by one of their great leaders, Dr Mahathir, despite the veteran politician's racist remarks.

In his own words 15 years ago Dr Mahathir said: "The establishment of a fully united Malaysian nation with a sense of common and shared destiny, a nation that is at peace with itself, territorially and ethnically integrated, living in harmony and in full and fair partnership, made up of one Bangsa Malaysia (one Malaysian nation) with political loyalty and dedication to the nation."

It's up to Umno leaders now if they really want to achieve the former premier's dream of Vision 2020, and that's just 12 years from now, or continue to talk racial politics.

kzso - get rid of kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah, 4th floor, hp6 ministers and supreme council members. then pl to get tun dr mahathir, ku li and other umno veterans to sit down and discuss the way forward. that's all.

Umno dissidents want change in leadership

Umno dissidents want change in leadership

KOTA BARU: Certain dissidents in Umno are calling for a leadership change in the party following the Permatang Pauh by-election defeat while others are claiming that Barisan Nasional was ill-prepared to take on Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Veteran politician Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has called for a renewal of leadership in Umno following Barisan Nasional’s loss in the pulsating Permatang Pauh parliamentary by-election.

In a statement, he said the result was proof that the wave of change gripping the country could not be discounted and so Umno must change to adapt in a world growing more complex by the day.

“The people of Malaysia demand leadership that can be trusted to unite us, to restore confidence in our institutions, and to forge a clear national direction.

In Kuala Terengganu, Mentri Besar Datuk Ahmad Said said the Barisan election machinery had failed to do its “homework” and was unprepared for the by-election.

“I observed how the BN election workers functioned during my campaigning period and felt that they were weak in convincing the voters,” he said after chairing the weekly state exco meeting yesterday.

Ahmad said the “K5” system should have been used for the by-election. Under this system, each Barisan election worker must convince five voters to vote for Barisan.

“However, this was not the case and I was shocked to see in-fighting among Umno members who were interested in vying for party posts during the crucial period,” he said.

In Muar, several Umno branch leaders represented by Datuk Kadar Shah Tun Sulaiman Ninam Shah said Umno leaders should realise by now that the Malays, including those in Permatang Pauh, had lost confidence in Umno's leadership.

He said they should accept the fact that they needed to adopt a more realistic approach if they wanted to regain the confidence of the Malays.

He said that one major reason for Barisan's loss was the swearing on the Quran by both Saiful Bukhari Azlan and Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said Umno leaders should not allow the use of the Quran to resolve personal matters or to prove one's innocence. “We are sad that the Quran has been used as a means to resolve personal and political matters.

In Kuala Lumpur, Umno Youth exco member Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir, who is also Jerlun MP, said changes in Umno's top leadership should take place now.

“We have a credibility problem now due to the weak leadership. If we still continue with our good old ways, we will be defeated again,” he said.

kzso - will umno leaderships listen and take note on this?

Dr Mahathir fires a salvo at Anwar

Dr Mahathir fires a salvo at Anwar

PUTRAJAYA: Just a day after Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim won the Permatang Pauh Parliamentary seat, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad fired his first salvo at him by claiming the PKR adviser could “convince even the devil to follow him”.

Dr Mahathir predicted that once back in Parliament, Anwar would make “life very difficult” for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
Reaching out: Dr Mahathir and his wife Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Ali entertaining a youth group from the Presbyterian Church of seven countries at the Perdana Leadership Foundation in Putrajaya yesterday.

“I don’t think Abdullah is a match for Anwar. He is going to raise all kinds of issues and questions and will demand and pressure the Prime Minister for answers. It is going to be a tough time for Barisan,” he said.

Dr Mahathir, however, felt that Anwar would not get 30 MPs to switch sides to form the government. He said the PKR adviser might think he could “buy” the MPs but it would be impossible for him to “outbid the other bidders who have more money.”

“The Permatang Pauh by-election results is a clear message for Barisan Nasional, Umno and its leaders. Within five months after the March 8 polls, Barisan lost the seat again, with a bigger majority than the last time.

“I believe this will be the trend at other places as well,” he said when met at his office yesterday.

He said Abdullah, his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and other leaders should not close their “ears and eyes” to the people’s message and should not blame the Permatang Pauh defeat on sabotage or other elements.

“If changes are made two years from now, then Umno will face an uphill task to gain strength and the people’s confidence. If they fail to change, then Barisan can expect defeat in the 13th general election,” he said, adding he was willing to come back to the party if Abdullah stepped down before the scheduled handover to Najib in 2010.

He said Umno should be concerned that the party was losing popularity and appeal and even the DAP had become more appealing to the Malays, referring to former Transparency International Malaysia chairman Tunku Aziz Tunku Ibrahim joining the DAP.

kzso - bn and umno changes must be made NOW rather than 2010 which is too late already.

Analysis #1 on Permatang Pauh by-election

Analysis on Permatang Pauh by-election:

August 2008:



Anwar : 31,195 votes
Azizah : 30,338
difference : +857

Ariff : 15,524
Firdaus : 16,950
Difference : -1,426

Spoilt votes : 447

then the increased of votes for anwar is only : 857-447 = 410

turnout
ge : 82.06% from 58,449 : 47,376
by-e : 81.01% from 58,449 : 47,963
difference : -587

let's say the one who did not turn-up and vote are 'protest voters' from umno/bn;
then anwar's increased/additional votes is lower i.e -177 (410-587)

then who says that anwar has increased his majority in this permatang pauh? it's less actually but the fact is permatang pauh is anwar's fortress and stronghold.... that's why he dares to say that if he put in his songkok and kain pelkat, he'll sure win. with the current sentiment of current economic situation, pl's leadership which is actually under the influence of kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah, 4th floor; any tom, dick and harry will win any by-election.

kzso - let's see how anwar perform in parliament as the pakatan leader. now people can see his true colors....

Anwar ' menang besar ' hanya dengan 857 undi baru

Anwar ' menang besar ' hanya dengan 857 undi baru

Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengesahkan tempatnya di Dewan Rakyat apabila memangi pilihan raya kecil Permatang Pauh dengan majoriti 15,671 undi.

Anwar memperolehi memperolehi 31,195 undi menewaskan dua calon lain iaitu Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah calon Barisan Nasional (BN) memperolehi 15,524 undi dan calon AKIM, Hanafi Hamad pula hanya memperolehi 92 undi.

Pengumuman rasmi keputusan pilihan raya itu diumumkan kira-kira jam 10 Selasa malam di pusat penjumlahan undi di Institut Perguruan Tuanku Bainun.

Pilihan raya kecil tersebut diadakan ekoran tindakan bekas Ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh, Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Azizah Wan Ismail yang juga Presiden PKR dan isteri Anwar, melepaskan jawatannya bagi membolehkan Anwar bertanding.

Pada pilihan raya umum, Mac lalu Wan Azizah memperolehi majoriti lebih 13,000 undi.

Pengumuman keputusan tersebut disambut dengan sorakan kuat diiringi dengan tembakan bunga api oleh para penyokong Anwar yang berhimpun di padang pusat penjumlahan undi tersebut.

Dianggarkan kira-kira 20,000 ribu penyokong parti pembangkang berhimpun bagi meraikan kejayaan Anwar. Suasana sekitar tempat pengumuman telah mula sejak sejak jam 7 petang.

Berucap kepada para penyokongnya selepas diumumkan sebagai pemenang pilihan raya berkenaan, Anwar terus mengulangi kempennya untuk membentuk kerajaan persekutuan yang baru di bawah gabungan parti-parti pembangkang, PKR, DAP dan PAS.

Bagi menguatkan perang sarafnya itu, Anwar berkata, keputusan pilihan raya kecil itu adalah isyarat awal baginya mencapai harapan tersebut.

Dalam blognya pula, Anwar berkata, beliau akan ke Parlimen pagi Rabu.

Sementara itu Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak pada sidang media ketika mengulas keputusan pilihan raya kecil itu, berkata, ia menjadi bukti amalan demokrasi masih segar di negara ini.

Katanya, kemenangan Anwar pada pilihan raya itu membuktikan tiada manipulasi daripada segi perjalanan demokrasi di negara ini.

“Tak tempang dari segi amalan demokrasi di negara ini,” katanya.

Sementara itu diketika para penyokong Anwar sama ada dari PKR, DAP dan PAS seronok dengan majoriti kemenangannya 15,671 melebihi 13, 388 yang diperolehi isterinya pada pilih raya umum Mac lalu namun, jika mengambil sedikit masa untuk mengira beliau sebenarnya hanya mampu meraih 857 pengundi baru.

Ini kerana pada Mac lalu, Wan Azizah memperolehi 30,338 undi sedangkan Anwar hanya mendapat 31, 195 undi sahaja. Jika dibandingkan undi mereka, Anwar cuma dapat lebih 857 undi sahaja.

Memang Anwar memperolehi majoriti lebih besar berbanding Wan Azizah tetapi jumlahnya hanya 2,283 undi.

Arif Shah cuma kurang bernasib baik kerana perbezaan majoriti beliau dengan Anwar disebabkan undi diperolehi calon AKIM (92) serta undi rosak (447) dan peratusan keluar mengundi kurang 1.06 peratus berbanding pilihan raya Mac lalu.

Pilihan raya kali ini hanya 81 peratus daripada 58,459 pengundi berdaftar keluar mengundi berbanding 82.06 peratus daripada 58,449 pengundi dalam pilihan raya umum lalu.

Pada pilihanraya lalu, calon BN, Datuk Firdaus Ismail memperolehi 16, 950 undi manakala Arif Shah cuma mendapat 15, 524 undi. Ini bermakna kekurangan 1,426 undi sahaja.

Seandainya, tiada calon AKIM (92 undi) dan undi rosak tidak sebanyak itu (447 undi) serta jumlah peratusan keluar mengundi adalah sama, keputusan pilihan raya kecil Permatang Pauh kali ini pasti berbeza.

Kesimpulannya, dengan 857 undi baru yang memihaknya, pemimpin de Facto PKR itu tidak sehebat mana walaupun mendapat sokongan dalam dan luar negara untuk menenangi semula kerusi Permatang Pauh yang diwarisi isterinya selama 10 tahun sebelum ini.–

kzso - the fact is permatang pauh is anwar's stronghold and fortress. nevertheless, it also shows that rakyat are giving signal that we are suffering and also pl needs to sack and kick his son-in-law+kamaluddin+kalimullah+4th floor and hp6 supreme council members and ministers!

Renewed opportunism in Umno

Renewed opportunism in Umno

AUG 27 — It's is hardly surprising that Umno leadership pretenders, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir, have renewed calls for Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's resignation as premier after Barisan Nasional's comprehensive defeat in the Permatang Pauh by-election.

The pressure for Abdullah to step down started right after BN's disastrous performance in the general election but quietened soon after the prime minister and his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak announced a transition plan which would see the latter taking over both the administration and party sometime in the middle of 2010.

Although not unanimously accepted by Umno rank and file, it was enough to buy Abdullah some time to build his legacy and give Najib a chance to resuscitate a tattered public image courtesy of his top advisor's involvement in the gruesome Altantuya murder.

The transition plan scuppered plans by Abdullah's detractors in the party to oust him during Umno's general assembly in December. Most notably, Abdullah chief critic from within his own cabinet, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, was forced to back down from contesting one of the two top posts in Umno to defending his third-tier vice presidency.

Many felt Muhyiddin was forced to retreat because with Abdullah and Najib circling the wagon with the transition plan, there was little support among party leaders and warlords for him to move up the party hierarchy.

Similarly, Tengku Razaleigh's campaign to once again become the president of Umno was losing its momentum. Privately his advisers admitted to fighting a losing battle and the transition plan was as good as a nail in his political coffin.

For Mukhriz, his political career's high point of replicating his father's act of dissent by writing a letter demanding the prime minister's resignation lost any traction it may have generated with the 2010 plan and his own hopes of becoming the next party youth leader were also diminishing with a strong surge of popularity of former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Mohd Khir Toyo among grassroots youth members.

So for these Abdullah critics, the result of the Permatang Pauh by-election is another opportunity for them to generate momentum against the prime minister.

They claim that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's victory is confirmation of the rakyat's rejection and repudiation of Abdullah's leadership. The result is a signal that nothing has been done to salvage the situation since the general election and BN needs a new leader before it becomes too late.

Such calls are at best opportunistic. First of all, this was not an election that was winnable for BN. It took place in Anwar's "back yard" and is a seat that has been in the Anwar family for the last seven terms.

From the get go, many in Umno had already conceded defeat and this was reflected in the reality that at times during the campaign it appeared as though Najib was the only Umno leader working the ground.

While admittedly the prime minister's public approval ratings have been sliding, they are still as strong as Anwar's and Najib's. The by-election was fought under very difficult localised circumstances for BN and to use the results to hasten Abdullah's departure would be opportunistic as well as missing the point of the defeat.

Secondly, the by-election was, if anything, framed as a referendum between Anwar and Najib. Again, although this is unfair because it was held in Anwar's stronghold, many sized up both "prime ministers-in-waiting" during the campaign.

Anwar was as relentless in his attacks on Najib and vice versa. The deputy prime minister believed at one point his own credibility was at stake and swore in a mosque that he never met Altantuya or had anything to do in her murder.

If anything, Najib is as damaged as Abdullah after this by-election campaign which means whenever a leadership does transition takes place, it will do little to save the fate of Umno and BN.

To be fair, Tengku Razaleigh understood this and launched his latest salvo against the top two leaders. Mukhriz, on the other hand, was more disingenuous refusing to criticise Najib for tactical reasons relating to his own future career and limiting his attacks to his father's arch enemy, Abdullah.

Thirdly, Umno and BN must understand that this is not the time to mess about with pressure on the leadership. With Anwar's threat of Sept 16 looming, Umno and BN need to hunker down, close ranks and train their guns outwards.

They are already going to be in for a rough ride with Anwar as the parliamentary opposition leader, they cannot afford to waste their time and energy attacking their own leadership especially after a transition plan between Abdullah and Najib was put in place very recently.

Lastly, the calls for the prime minister to step down again demonstrates Umno's ignorance of the real causes for their plunging popularity. It is not Abdullah per se that the rakyat are rejecting but the system that Umno is seen to propagate.

The refusal to reform, the denial of corruption and the inability to appear magnanimous to non-Malay interests continue to characterise Umno. This is what the rakyat is against and they punished Abdullah for it in the general election because he let them down by not moving firmly enough with his reform agenda.

Umno needs to understand that the by-election result was largely due to Anwar and his personal connection with the voters of Permatang Pauh. While there may be many national factors, these alone do not explain Anwar's resounding win.

He is "family" to the people of Permatang Pauh - a favourite son that they believe will be prime minister. To take the result and turn it against Abdullah smacks of sheer opportunism and denial of the root causes for Umno’s and BN's continued decline into obscurity.

kzso - ppl know that anwar will win because it's his fortress and stronghold; that's why he goes for permatang pauh rather than bukit bintang and kulim seat; but the rakyat also want to tell pl that we do not want him, kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah, 4th floor and hp6 ministers + supreme council to helmthe country anymore and wake up! rakyat are suffering....

Don't View Anwar's Victory Lightly, Says Muhyiddin

Don't View Anwar's Victory Lightly, Says Muhyiddin

SINGAPORE, Aug 27 (Bernama) -- Barisan Nasional (BN) should not take lightly the victory of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in the Permatang Pauh parliamentary by-election, said Umno Vice-President Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

Muhyiddin said he was concerned that the voters' decision to give victory to the opposition would become a trend. "Although it was just a by-election, it could be an indication of a trend that the voters had already decided that they wanted change even if they didn't know what the changes were, and refused to accept BN's leadership," he told Malaysian journalists here.
Muhyiddin, who is International Trade and Industry Minister, was here to attend the Asean Economic Ministers Meeting.

He said BN and Umno should conduct a post-mortem and take steps to speed up Umno's reinventing process as well as measures to rebrand the BN with new approach more acceptable to the people.

According to him, this would require the BN and Umno to re-evaluate whether their approach to campaign was already "stale and no longer acceptable to the people."

"It is clear that we need to make swift changes to the organisation and to the way we do things," he said.

Muhyiddin added that the results also showed that the voters' mindset had shifted and that they now wanted something which "are fairer, not racial-based (politics) but one that is based on the profile of the multiracial and multi-religious Malaysians." "Umno should be prepared to make the change," he said.

Muhyiddin said, however, that Anwar's victory was something to be expected and accepted as it was the wishes of the people, who made their choice under a democratic process.

"It may be that whatever is said about Anwar, the people and voters just refuse to believe it.
"The explanation given by our leaders was not accepted as though it was already decided from the outset that the BN would lose and PKR would win," he said.

Meanwhile, MCA Secretary-General Datuk Seri Ong Ka Chuan said all parties should accept Anwar's victory as it was the wishes of the people.

"We must respect the voters' decision and the country's democratic practices.

"Irrespective of the BN's view, we must accept the people's decision," he told reporters in Genting Highlands after opening the 30th anniversary of the National Association of Malaysian Life Insurance and Financial Advisor.

Anwar won the by-election with a 15,671-vote majority after securing 31,195 votes, defeating BN candidate Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah, who obtained 15,524 votes.

Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia candidate, Hanafi Mamat, lost his deposit after obtaining only 92 votes. There were 447 spoilt votes.


Don't Misinterpret Permatang Pauh By-election's Result, Says Abdullah

JOHOR BAHARU, Aug 27 (Bernama) -- The result of the Permatang Pauh by-election, which was won by Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, cannot be interpreted as a trend that can happen in other constituencies, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said Wednesday.

The prime minister said the Barisan Nasional (BN) which won 140 parliamentary seats in the March 8 general election still commanded strong support from the people.

"What happened in Permatang Pauh was not something so big as to change the situation that exists after the last general election.

"The Permatang Pauh by-election is one by-election that cannot be interpreted as something that can happen in other constituencies. I believe we can still continue the government,"

Abdullah, who is also BN chairman, told reporters after sending off Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah at the Senai Airport here Wednesday.

Anwar Ibrahim won the Permatang Pauh by-election Tuesday with a 15,671-vote majority, garnering 31,195 votes against the BN's Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah, 51, who obtained 15,524 votes.

The other candidate, Hanafi Mamat, 61, of Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia (Akim) lost his deposit as he only received 92 votes.

kzso - pl, please wake up from your sleeplah and sweet dream; look what's happening around you ;the people are suffering and anwar/dap and pas is taking the opportunity. don't wait until 1511 happens again! at least there is still hope in umno when they still have leaders like muhyiddin. is pl still sleeping when he says don't worry it will not be a trend and not an indication; pl, for once pls do not listen to kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah and your hp6 supreme council and ministers

Umno Leaders Call Abdullah To Quit After Shameful Defeat

Umno Leaders Call Abdullah To Quit After Shameful Defeat

KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) - -

Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi faced calls to quit from within his ruling party Wednesday after opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim scored a landslide by-election victory.

Anwar won the vote to return to parliament despite an intense campaign mounted by the Barisan Nasional coalition, which he has promised to unseat within a month with the help of defecting lawmakers.

The failure to check Anwar has heaped more pressure on Abdullah, who has fought to hold on to his job since March general elections in which the opposition gained unprecedented ground.

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, a senior member of the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) which leads the ruling coalition, called for a new leadership "to unite our people... and forge a clear national direction."

"(Abdullah) does not have the minimal credibility needed to run the country day by day, let alone to take it in the new directions we need to go in a complex world," he said.

"This dangerous situation cannot continue."

Razaleigh said the coalition's by-election campaign, which was criticised for its racial overtones and focus on sodomy allegations against Anwar, has "embarrassed and divided the nation with its ugliness."

"It is time to face the music: it is we who have been buried," he said.

Razaleigh plans to challenge Abdullah for the party leadership in December polls, but is likely to fail after the premier silenced calls for his immediate ouster by agreeing to hand over power to his deputy Najib Razak in 2010.

Abdullah's main critic, former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, has also called for the resignation of his successor after relations between the two soured in 2006.

Mahathir's son Mukhriz, another senior UMNO figure who is vying for the top spot in the party's influential youth wing, also called for Abdullah's immediate resignation."I think Abdullah should strongly consider for all our sakes, to step down now," he told AFP."This is a second time that the Malaysian people have given a clear message, with the first at the general elections. It is a rejection of the present leader and he must leave now."

wake up umno members

kzso - will pl listen to this call? quite doubtful because he'll only listen to kj, kamaluddin and kalimullah and there will be "yes sir" and hp6 type of ministers backing him up and the people who call it will be bashed upside down.... now it's up to umno members to give 'clear signal' taht they do not want him, kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah, hp6 ministers and supreme council members

Dr M: Malaysia lacks good decision-making

Dr M: Malaysia lacks good decision-making

KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 26,2008) :

Malaysia is lacking in good decision-making because it fails to anticipate the problems of the future.

Former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said to achieve Vision 2020, "we must anticipate the problems we may face in the future and be ready to make decisions to counter them".
Dr Mahathir, who introduced Vision 2020 to Malaysia, said the world is going through price hikes in fuel, food, aluminium and steel and Malaysia now needs to be able to handle the high-cost situation.

"Our people are used to very low cost of living, services and food and they are not prepared to face a high cost of living. I think we need to learn from countries with a high cost of living -- how do they survive, how do they prosper and how to be competitive," he said, at the Futurist forum 2008 entitled "Mindset: A framework to anticipate the future" today.

"If we do not do that, then I think we cannot achieve Vision 2020."

Addressing questions from participants on Malaysia's incompetency, Dr Mahathir said: "Malaysia is the most planned country in the world. But people do not follow the plans prepared for them. If people had followed the plans, we would have been a developed country by now." He said every plan has to have an implementation strategy, without which the plan is useless.

"Fortunate for Malaysia, we do have an implementation unit and the Economic Planning Unit," he said.

Dr Mahathir said planning for people is much more difficult because people resent others telling them what to do or how to think.

"I have spent 22 years trying to change the mindset of the Malays, for example, and I must admit that I have failed in that, but people won't give any more time."

Among other issues, Dr Mahathir also said the education system had become very politicised. He said the people's mentality has not changed, they want different kinds of education system because they want to preserve their own languages, they want more emphasis in religious education and so on. He said the people like to blame politicians but the politicians are complying with the people's wishes.

Dr Mahathir also said national intergration is difficult to achieve because politicians are bringing out sensitive issues which create more division amongst the people. "People think for a multiracial country, we are doing rather well but even then we need to be extremely careful," he added.

kzso - in another word, we are lacking good leaders. what we have now is pl, kj, kamaluddin, kalimullah, hp6 supreme council/ministers and 4th floor manning this country. get rid of this jokers and hp6 supreme council and ministers!

Anwar's in, Pak Lah's out

Anwar's in, Pak Lah's out

AUG 27 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's stunning win at the Permatang Pauh by-election not only cemented his position as the undisputed leader of the opposition in Malaysia, it prompted senior Umno politicians to begin the countdown to Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's last day in office.

The majority view is that he has to go by the end of the year if Umno and BN are to stand any chance of checking the advance of Pakatan Rakyat and holding onto to power at the next general elections.

Tuesday night was a repeat of March 8 with Pakatan Rakyat giddy with an electoral success and BN politicians dizzy with another rejection by the public.

But the joy was sweeter for the opposition because their icon not only won but did so in style, trouncing BN's Arif Shah by a 15,671 majority, 2,000 more votes than what his wife obtained five months ago.

The pain was more severe for BN because unlike March 8, they were not caught blind-sided. They poured in millions of ringgit into the campaign, brought their heavy hitters, threw every conceivable missile at Anwar but still ended up losing badly.

The consequences of the Permatang Pauh by-election could be far-reaching, with even Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's neatly-packaged two-year transition of power under threat from increasingly disillusioned party members and leaders of coalition partners.

On Tuesday, only two hours after the last box of votes had been counted, senior Umno politicians were in deep discussion over the need for Abdullah to step down, believing that he had lost the ability to check a resurgent opposition.

A check of the voting pattern at 25 polling stations showed that Anwar snared a handy portion of Malays votes and the bulk of non-Malay votes.

Even the Siamese electorate – a traditional bank of BN support – gave their vote to Anwar.

Najib put on a brave face, saying that Anwar's victory proved that democracy was alive in Malaysia. Left unsaid was that the BN defeat showed that not much had changed on the ground since March 8. Despite the raft of promises by Abdullah to reform the system, the public was not moved.

If anything, Permatang Pauh confirmed that Chinese and Indians no longer fear giving their support to the Opposition.

It also confirmed that the umbilical cord between the Malaysian voter and the Barisan Nasional has been severed.

BN politicians have compiled a list of excuses for the heavy defeat, saying that Permatang Pauh has always been Anwar's fortress; that the campaign was pockmarked with allegations and innuendoes and that the electorate was in no mood to support the establishment because of the rising cost of living.

But they all sounded like excuses and could not obscure the fact that BN suffered its heaviest by-election defeat in recent memory.

Never has BN been in a deeper hole. Never has Abdullah Ahmad Badawi faced such a bleak picture.

kzso - umno leaderships wake up! do not wait until ge or 2 to 3 years before ge changes are made; it'll be too late already. get ku li/najib/muhyiddin to lead umno NOW. get rakyat's and umno solidarity and confidence back again! to najib, if you want to lead umno and the country you better take care and control of rosmah. she is and she will be your downfall.

PERMATANG PAUH - Dr Mahathir Mohamad

PERMATANG PAUH

Posted by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad at August 27, 2008 1:20 PM

1. Apa yang telah dijangka sudah pun berlaku.

2. Anwar menang.

3. Barisan Nasional kalah.

4. Saya biasa menulis berkenaan dilema Melayu. Saya percaya dalam pilihanraya kecil Permatang Pauh ramai yang berada dalam keadaan serba salah. Bukan sahaja Melayu tetapi juga bukan Melayu.

5. Ramai pengundi tidak ingin undi bagi Dato Seri Anwar. Tetapi mereka juga tidak ingin undi Barisan Nasional. Calon Barisan Nasional baik tetapi kalau beliau menang maka Dato Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi akan dakwa yang dirinya menang, dakwa yang sokongan kepada Barisan Nasional iaitu pada dirinya sudah kembali, dakwa Barisan Nasional telah dipulih dibawah kepimpinannya.

6. Saya percaya dengan berat hati penyokong-penyokong Barisan Nasional telah undi PKR supaya Dato Seri Abdullah akan sedar yang kepimpinannya tidak dikehendaki lagi.

7. Wang yang banyak telah ditabur atau dijanji akan ditabur. Pekerja Barisan Nasional dibayar saguhati. Calon yang diletak sesuai juga. Apakah yang tidak kena dengan Barisan Nasional sehingga pengundi memberi kelebihan undi yang lebih banyak dari bulan Mac kepada Dato Anwar yang enggan bersumpah.

8. Mesej yang hendak dihantar oleh pengundi Melayu, Cina dan India menjadi sia-sia kerana Dato Seri Abdullah tidak ada telinga untuk mendengar, tidak ada mata untuk melihat.

9. Tetapi ahli UMNO daripada pemimpin lain UMNO perlu sedar dan faham mesej daripada pengundi Permatang Pauh. Sejak Mac 2008 sokongan kepada UMNO dan BN bukan pulih tetapi merosot.

10. Kamu boleh terus sokong Dato Seri Abdullah sebagai Presiden parti. Tetapi rakyat tidak akan sokong UMNO kerana UMNO sudah jadi alat Dato Seri Abdullah dan keluarganya. Apabila datang pilihanraya ketiga belas rakyat akan jatuhkan UMNO dan Barisan Nasional kerana hanya dengan cara ini sahaja rakyat akan dapat jatuhkan Dato Seri Abdullah.

11. Malang bagi UMNO dan Barisan Nasional. Tetapi kerana UMNO dan Barisan Nasional tidak sanggup bertindak, rakyat terpaksa bertindak.

12. Untuk pulihkan sokongan kepada UMNO dan Barisan Nasional, Dato Seri Abdullah perlu bertanggungjawab dan letak jawatan sekarang. Ini akan memberi masa empat tahun bagi pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO berusaha untuk menarik balik penyokong UMNO dan Barisan Nasional. Jika ditunggu hingga Jun 2010 masa yang tinggal untuk pemulihan hanyalah 2 tahun; terlalu pendek untuk kerja yang berat ini.

13. Pilihan bagi UMNO hanya dua. Setia kepada Dato Seri Abdullah dan kalah dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke 13 atau setia kepada UMNO lebih daripada setia kepada Dato Seri Abdullah dengan kemungkinan menang Pilihanraya Umum ke-13.

14. UMNO perlu ingat undi daripada ahli-ahli setianya sahaja tidak mencukupi untuk mendapat kemenangan. Untuk menang calon UMNO perlu undi orang bukan ahli parti dan orang Cina dan India. Dalam keadaan sekarang, dalam keadaan UMNO dan Kerajaan di pimpin oleh Dato Seri Abdullah tidak mungkin orang bukan daripada parti UMNO dan orang Cina dan India akan beri kemenangan kepada calon UMNO atau Barisan Nasional. Bahkan ahli-ahli UMNO yang kecewa dengan pimpinan Dato Seri Abdullah pun tidak akan undi UMNO dan Barisan Nasional.

15. Saya percaya akhbar dan TV arus perdana akan putar cerita pilihanraya kecil Permatang Pauh untuk menyedapkan hati pemimpin UMNO dan Dato Seri Abdullah. Justeru itu pemimpin, terutama Dato Seri Abdullah akan yakin yang dianya dikehendaki untuk pulih semula parti. Dan UMNO pun akan terus pilihnya dengan sebulat suara pada bulan Disember. Dan akan merosot lagilah UMNO dan Barisan Nasional.

16. Dengarlah, lihatlah apa yang dipertunjukkan oleh pengundi Permatang Pauh. Mereka tidak undi untuk Dato Seri Anwar dan PKR. Mereka undi untuk mengalahkankan Barisan Nasional dan UMNO.

17. Kelebihan undi bagi Dato Seri Anwar berbanding Mac 2008 tentulah kerana dalam jangka hanya lima bulan sokongan kepada BN dan UMNO merosot lagi.

18. Nak tunggu sampai bila wahai ahli UMNO, sebelum kamu sedar akan perlunya kepimpinan Dato Seri Abdullah ditamatkan?

kzso - it's not PL that need to go but umno members MUST eliminate and throw out kj, kamaruddin, kalimullah and all other hp6 supreme council members. PL is ok but his problem is that he has around him wrong/selfish/self-centered advisors and trusted people around him. If PL and umno leaders do not want to listen in sacking and throwing out kj, kalimullah, kamaluddin out of malaysian politics, then only we'll throw him and all umno leaders out!

Anwar Pejuang Gereja Sejati

Anwar Pejuang Gereja Sejati

taminsari

kzso - sokongan tersurat dan tersirat dari pertubuhan gereja seluruh sabah

FT Mufti: Saiful's oath is valid

FT Mufti: Saiful's oath is valid
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 25 - Saiful Bukhari Azlan's oath is valid and does not contravene Islamic law according to Federal Territory Mufti Datuk Wan Zahidi Wan Teh.

"An oath is valid as long as he swears in the name of Allah and says a qasam alphabet -- waw, ba and ta -- by uttering Walahi, Wabillahi, Watawallahi," he told reporters in his office at the Federal Territories Islamic Affairs Department today.

He said this was so as there were two kinds of oaths; one in the course of proceedings in a Syariah court and another outside of a trial, adding that the latter could be performed freely if one chose to do so to make a general statement.

He did, however, note that while Saiful's oath had no relation to the one taken in a Syariah court, "it is up to the court if they want to use it as evidence."

He also commented on the sacred position of hukum (Islamic law) when expressing his doubts over the credibility of Ramlang Porigi, the imam who had overseen Saiful's oath and had yesterday said the oath was invalid due to technicalities.

"Whoever makes a decision on hukum without making reference to credible sources of knowledge has a place in hell ready for him. This is because what you say will guide the public. When you talk about hukum, you are signing off on it on behalf of Allah.

"Where is his reference? I was informed he is only a low-ranking officer. What are his qualifications? As an imam, he may not be qualified to speak on matters of law and I have doubts that he can read scripture," the mufti said, adding that Ramlang's comments may confuse Muslims.

Seeking to assert his authority on the matter, he added that this was why he had a book of scripture in front of him throughout the press conference.

"When I write, I make references to the scripture. I don't dare to speak just from my memory alone."

He also added that Ramlang attended the swearing as a matter of procedure at the mosque, not because Islamic law required witnesses or an imam to conduct it. However, he did concur with Ramlang that it was not a sumpah muhabalah as it required the agreement of both parties.

According to Wan Zahidi, hukum did not require issues such as time, place, the need for a witness, the swearing on a Quran or the subject matter of the oath as conditions for taking an oath that is not part of Syariah proceedings.

He added, however, that one could add weight when swearing by doing any of the following: after the Asar prayers on Friday, in a mosque by the pulpit, with a holy book or the reading of the 77th verse from Surah Aal Imran.

"And using just one qasam alphabet is sufficient but Saiful chose to say all three out of his own confidence."

On this point he insisted that the similarities to the Christian act of swearing on the Bible was a non-issue.

"Similarities cannot be assumed to be an act of copying. For example, Christians say Amen and Muslims say Amin when praying."

Wan Zahidi also said that any Muslim could take an oath at the mosque as it was meant to be utilised by Muslims but stopped short of saying that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, whom Saiful accused of sodomy, should do likewise.

Instead, he said that the issue should not be politicised: "Religion is the domain of Allah and should not be used to forward any agenda but the truth."


kzso - for now the mufti of perlis, perak, ft have given their personal opinion. what about muftis from kedah, n. sembilan, johore, terengganu and kelantan? it's ok to get the personal opinion from muftis but it's much better to have an ijtima' ulama' so that the majlis fatwa can give a fatwa on this....

Imam"s bombshell to help PKR"s last-minute campaign

Imam"s bombshell to help PKR"s last-minute campaign

By Wan Hamidi Hamid

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 25 It"s an eleventh-hour advantage for Parti Keadilan Rakyat.

The imam who witnessed Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan"s swearing on the Quran to accuse Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim of sodomising him has cast doubts on the oath.

With less than a day to campaign in the Permatang Pauh by-election, observers noted that the Barisan Nasional"s strongest point of attack against the former deputy prime minister has been blunted.

This means the public confession by Ramlang Porigi, the imam of the Kuala Lumpur mosque, made in Permatang Pauh late last night has freed Anwar from having to take the same Quranic vow to prove his innocence.

Ramlang witnessed Saiful taking his oath on the eve of the Permatang Pauh by-election. Although Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has said it was not politically motivated, he has been demanding that Anwar take the same oath to deny any wrongdoing.

The PKR de facto leader has refused, and for that, he has been vilified by BN leaders as well as the mainstream media.

To put further pressure on Anwar, Najib, who is leading the BN campaign in the by-election, swore in a Permatang Pauh mosque that he had nothing to do with the murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu.

On Anwar"s part, he and his campaigners have been insinuating that the Umno deputy president had somehow been involved in the murder linked to an alleged multibillion ringgit submarine deal.

But in front of thousands in Penanti last night, the imam, who said he did not arrange the ceremony on Aug 15, claimed he was directed by -a higher authority- to conduct the oath-taking ritual.

He added that the oath was not completely Islamic as both parties the accused and the accuser must attend. It was an ex-parte admission by Saiful.

When met by the press, Ramlang insisted that as a civil servant he is one of the nine official imams paid by the government to run the KL mosque he must obey the directives from his superiors.

Why did he have to be on a PKR ceramah platform to explain himself? Ramlang said he did not want to be blamed for conspiring with Umno, and the fact that no one in authority defended him.
He has been exposed as an Umno member registered as a voter in Penanti under the Permatang Pauh parliamentary constituency, which he later confirmed.

He even asked the voters of Permatang Pauh to stop blaming him for having to do what was directed by the top people, and for that he received thunderous applause and chants of "Allahu Akbar" (God is Great).

PKR vice-president Azmin Ali, who leads the party"s campaign in the by-election, has denied rewarding Ramlang who came forward willingly.

He told the press that it was proven that the second sodomy allegation is yet another Umno political conspiracy against his boss.

With less than 24 hours to go before polling, PKR and its allies especially Pas are expected to bombard the Malay-majority areas with this latest bombshell.

Many Malay voters are in doubt after Saiful"s oath despite repeated assurance from Pas religious scholars that it was a wrong way to take an oath.

Ramlang"s insinuation that Saiful was not all worried when taking his oath is expected to seen by many Malay voters as a signal that it was a false admission that"s what PKR campaigners are going to exploit today.

Anwar has refused to swear on the Quran despite calls by BN leaders, saying that many religious scholars advised him not to resort to it.

He has also referred the case to the Kuala Lumpur Islamic Religious Department, accusing Saiful of false accusation even as his Sodomy II charge is to be heard on Sept 10.

Anwar"s campaigners are striving to ensure their leader surpasses his wife Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Ismail"s majority of 13,000-plus votes in the March 8 general election.

kzso - yep.. the imam is right. it's not a sumpah mubahalah. actually it's called "alyamin qhairul qadhaiyah". according to the mufti of federal territory "....sumpah Mohd Saiful juga adalah sah sebagai sumpah di luar perbicaraan atau "alyamin qhairul qadhaiyah" dan bukan sumpah "mubahalah" seperti yang disiarkan oleh media."Ini kerana "mubahalah" memerlukan persetujuan pihak kedua seperti yang dinyatakan dalam ayat 61 Surah Ali Imran,"

Tengku Mahkota mahu ulama tampil jelaskan isu mubahalah

Tengku Mahkota mahu ulama tampil jelaskan isu mubahalah

KUANTAN 25 Ogos – Tengku Mahkota Pahang, Tengku Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah mahu golongan ulama tampil segera memberikan penjelasan berlandaskan al-Quran dan hadis berhubung isu bersumpah secara mubahalah.

Baginda bertitah, langkah itu perlu bagi menghilangkan segala kekeliruan yang timbul di kalangan umat Islam berhubung isu sumpah tersebut.

Tegas baginda, penjelasan tersebut perlu mengikut ajaran Islam sebenar tanpa menyebelahi mana-mana pihak terutama parti politik

kzso - kepada sultan-sultan semua yang memegang kuasa dan hal-ehwal islam dan umat islam di negara ini, mohon diarahkan segala ulama'-ulama' dan mufti-mufti untuk berbincang mengenai sumpah yamin dan mubahalah ini untuk menghilangkan kekeliruan yang timbul di kalangan umat Islam ketika ini.

Demi politik....Anwar fitnah Najib amal agama Hindu

Demi politik....Anwar fitnah Najib amal agama Hindu

Demi politik tergamak Anwar fitnah Najib amal acara keagamaan Hindu…. Calon Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim hari Isnin membuat fitnah terbaru terhdap Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak mengamalkan acara kegamaan Hindu.

Pada sidang media di pejabat Yayasan Aman, bilik gerakan PKR di Permatang Pauh, Anwar membuat fitnah terbaru itu sebagai menjawab desakan kenapa beliau tidak mahu bersumpah mengikut cara Islam bagi membersihkan dirinya daripada dakwaan meliwat bekas pembantunya Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

“Najib angkat sumpah (merujuk kepada sumpah Najib di Masjid Guar Perahu, Jumaat malam) esok dia pergi sumpah Hindu dia pulak…adakah lusa dia nak pergi masjid lain angkat sumpah nak betulkan sumpah Hindu dia tu pula,” katanya.

Beliau dipercayai merujuk mengenai Hindu itu berdasarkan penyiaran akuan bersumpah seorang lelaki India beragama Hindu oleh pengendali laman web Malaysia Today, Raja Petra Kamaruddin yang menuduh Najib mengamalkan upacara sembayang mengikut agama Hindu.

Dalam akuan bersumpah itu, Najib didakwa membawa seorang sami Hindu ke rumahnya setiap bulan bagi mengadakan acara sembahyang mengikut cara Hindu dengan duduk di hadapan api serta menggunakan segala peralatan acara keagamaan itu.

Fitnah terbaru Anwar itu dilihat sebagai usaha beliau untuk mengalihkan perhatian daripada isu sebenar yang dihadapinya. Antara isu yang dihadapi Anwar ialah desakan agar beliau bersumpah bagi membersihkan dirinya dalam isu liwat. Kedua, desakan agar beliau memberisihkan namanya ekoran pendedahan teman karibnya, Datuk S Nallakarupan bahawa Anwar menerima wang daripada syarikat judi 4-nombor ekor, Magnum Corporation.

Pada sidang media itu juga ekoran soalan mengenai sumpah oleh wartawan Agendadaily, Anwar sekali lagi ‘menyerang’ Agendadaily dengan menjawab soalan dengan berkata, "Ini agenda Najib dan agenda UMNO".

Soalnya, soalan yang dikemukakan itu adalah biasa sahaja bagi mana-mana wartawan bagi mendapatkan reaksi kepada desakan dan tuntutan supaya Anwar bersumpah.

Namun, berdasarkan cara Anwar memberikan responnya, Anwar tidak selesa dengan soalan berikut kerana beliau tidak dapat memberikan jawapan secara objektif.

Bagi Agendadaily, inilah masalahnya bila ada pihak yang bersumpah mengikut cara Islam, Anwar akan segera mempertikaikannya tetapi bila ada akuan bersumpah seorang lelaki beragama Hindu, beliau akan percaya habis-habisan.

Ini adalah kali kelima Anwar serang Agendadaily

kzso - anwar..anwar..bertobat nasohalah kamu!

Antara Sumpah Saiful dan Kengganan Sumpah Anwar

Contributed by mulutmelayu

Dari pembelajaran aku tentang fiqah Islam, sumpah Saiful adalah betul dan sah dari segi Islam, agama anutan aku.

Sumpah 'al-yamin' yang dibuat oleh Saiful itu adalah berlandaskan kepada tuduhan Anwar Ibrahim serta Wan Azizah terhadapnya yang mengatakan Saiful membuat fitnah ekoran daripada laporan polis yang dibuat oleh Saiful terhadap Anwar.

Perlu kita ingat sumpah ini bukannya sumpah Li'an untuk seorang suami yang mendakwa isterinya melakukan perzinaan dengan lelaki lain. Mungkin kerana sisuami saja melihat kelakuan isterinya itu tanpa saksi-saksi lain, maka sisuami terpaksa bersumpah sebanyak 4 kali menggantikan 4 saksi-saksi lain dan sumpah kelimanya mengatakan jika dia berbohong memohon Allah melaknat dirinya. Jika isterinya juga berani mengatakan yang dia tidak melakukan sepertimana dakwaan suaminya, isterinya juga mesti bersumpah seperti sumpah li'an suaminya. Jika kedua-duanya bersumpah, kita sendiri tidak tahu siapa yang bercakap benar atau tidak. Hanya Allah swt maha mengetahui siapa yang bercakap benar atau sebaliknya.
Ekoran dari kedua-dua sumpah suami isteri itu, mengikut hukum Islam, sisuami dan isteri terpaksa berpisah (bercerai) selama-lamanya dan sekali-kali tidak boleh merujuk kembali pernikahan mereka.

Dalam sumpah Saiful ini segala rukun sumpah telahpun dipenuh oleh Saiful.
Pertama:
Baligh,

Kedua:
Menyebut "Wallahi, Wabillahi dan Watallahi,

Ketiga:
menyatakan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku (subject matter)

dan

Keempatnya:
Laknat Allah kepadanya jika dia berbohong dengan Allah swt.

Itu rukun sumpah jenis ini yang aku belajar dulu.

Pegang Al-Quran semasa bersumpah? Dari aku belajar dulu juga sama ada pegang atau tak pegang al-Quran bukannya merupakan rukun sumpah. Ianya tidak menjejaskan sama sekali rukun sumpah Saiful. Kecuali orang-orang Kristian, memegang Bible merupakan satu rukun dalam sumpah mereka.

Sebagaiman kita semua belajar juga mengikuti semua rukun itu adalah sah tetapi tidak mengikuti semua atau salah satu rukun hukumnya tidak sah. Sebagaimana kita juga belajar dalam rukun sembahyang. Jika kita tidak membaca al-Fatihah dalam sembahyang, sembahyang kita itu tidak sah.

Daripada sumpah al-Yamin yang dibuat oleh Saiful ini yang memberitahu Allah swt bahawa dia bercakap benar dan memohon Allah melaknatnya sehingga hari kiamat jika dia berbohong, tugasnya kepada Allah (dan agama Islam) telah selesai.

Setakat hari ini aku tidak nampak Anwar sanggup bersumpah al-Yamin mengatakan sumpah Saiful itu palsu (tidak meliwat Saiful).

[NOTA: Perlu diingat sumpah al-Yamin di antara manusia dengan Allah swt ini TIDAK BOLEH UNTUK DIGUNAKAN dalam perbicaraan mahkamah manusia antara manusia (mahkamh civil/jenayah). Walau bagaimanapun seperti sumpah li'an juga, sumpah al-yamin ini boleh (juga) digunakan di mahkamah syariah sebagaimana kes Anwar melaporkan kepada JAWI yang Saiful melakukan kesalahan Qazaf terhadapnya]

kzso - rayuan buat para ulama' dan mufti-mufti semua. "mohonlah dipohon diberikan penjelasan, bimbingan serta hukum mengenai sumpah al-yamin atau sumpah mubahalah. umat islam memerlukan bimbingan serta nasihat dan janganlah dibiarkan umat islam berpecah dan meronta-ronta menantikan kebenaran.

Kejutan Permatang Pauh berlaku malam ini ?

Kejutan Permatang Pauh berlaku malam ini ?

Jangan terkejut wahai seluruh pengundi Permatang Pauh dan juga penyokong Parti Keadilan Rakyat. Malam ini (tempat terpaksa dirahsiakan) dua orang Ahli Parlimen PKR akan membuat pengumuman keluar dari parti. Identiti mereka masih dirahsiakan untuk keselamatan tetapi seorang daripadanya adalah ‘jiran’ terdekat Permatang Pauh. Manakala seorang lagi juga ‘orang sini’.Tok Ayah difahamkan tindakan mereka ini setelah begitu kecewa dengan tindak-tanduk Penasihat PKR yang juga calon Parlimen Permatang Pauh Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Mereka bertindak keluar awal kerana yakin dan percaya bahawa jika Anwar dibenarkan menang di Permatang Pauh, PKR akan menjadi ‘milik orang’ dan bukan lagi kepunyaan Melayu.

Kejutan ini masih dianggap kecil dalam siri kempen pilihan raya kecil Parlimen Permatang Pauh yang tinggal lebih kurang dua hari sahaja lagi. Sebenarnya ada satu kejutan paling besar bakal berlaku selewatnya sebelum tengah malam esok iaitu sebelum tamat tempoh berkempen.

Kita tunggu dan kita lihat..

*********

Kalau siapa nak tahu apa kejutan yang diawalkan tu, tunggu sekejap aje lagi. Sekitar jam 5.00 petang waktu Permatang Pauh Saudara Khairi Jamaluddin bersama Saudara Ezam Md Nor akan mengadakan sidang akhbar bagi mengumumkan satu kejutan paling besar akan berlaku.

Kejutan ini Tok Ayah pasti adalah ‘kegemparan’ paling besar dan memberi tekanan terakhir kepada Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Kita tunggu dan Tok Ayah janji selepas tu berita tergempar itu akan menghiasi laman ini. Jumpa lagi…

********

Jangan terkejut tetapi ianya telah berlaku di Permatang Pauh. PKR menghadapi tekanan besar dalam hari-hari terakhir seorang insan yang bercita-cita untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia.

Dari sumber yang sahih Tok Ayah ingin menjelaskan bahawa semalam bertempat di Cinta Sayang Golf & Country Club Saudara Ezam Md Nor telah menjadi saksi seramai 288 orang pemimpin penting Parti Keadilan Rakyat bertindak keluar parti.

Dari sumber yang Tok Ayah ada pemimpin PKR itu terdiri dari seorang Ketua Pemuda Negeri, lima Ketua Bahagian dan ramai dari kalangan pemimpin peringkat bahagian. Senarai penuh nama dan jawatan mereka dalam PKR, Tok Ayah akan update kemudian.

Tindakan mereka dikatakan berpunca dari masalah dalaman PKR serta berlaku ‘bibit-bibit’ perebutan kuasa antara ‘bangsa’ dalam PKR. Bab yang ini akan Tok Ayah tulis kemudian setelah petang ini Tok Ayah berkesempatan bertemu dengan salah seorang orang kanan PKR tersebut.

Mulai malam ini rombongan 288 orang tersebut akan berkampong di Permatang Pauh bagi menjelaskan kepada rakyat ‘bukan mereka tidak sayangkan Anwar tetapi mereka lebih sayangkan bangsa dan negara ini’.

Kita jumpa malam ini dan jangan lupa tunggu kejutan kedua dari Tok Ayah selewatnya petang atau malam ini.

kzso - kita tungguuuuu samada ini berita gempak atau bikin gempak ajer

Nalla gembira disaman Anwar...baru boleh dedah semuanya di mahkamah

Nalla gembira disaman Anwar...baru boleh dedah semuanya di mahkamah

Dalam pada hilang kepercayaan kepada sistem perundangan negara ini, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah menyerahkan surat saman kepada rakan sepermainan tenisnya, Datuk S Nallakarupan kerana mendedahkan beliau menerima RM60 juta wang dari syarikat judi Magnum Corporation.

Perkara ini diberitahu sendiri oleh Nallakarupan bahawa beliau telah menerima surat saman itu yang menuntut beliau membayar ganti rugi sebanyak RM50 juta.

Sekali imbas, surat saman itu akan memberikan persepsi bahawa Anwar berani menyaman orang kerana merasakan pendedahan itu tidak benar dan satu pembohongan.

Namun apabila ditanya kepada Nallakarupan mengenai perkara itu, beliau memberikan jawapan yang agak menarik “Ini adalah hari paling gembira buat saya kerana pada akhirnya saya akan dapat jumpa Anwar di mahkamah. Nanti di mahkamah saya akan dedah dan buktikan semuanya mengenai wang RM60 juta itu.

“Saya juga akan dedahkan mengenai lima pita rakaman yang saya simpan di luar negara mengenai Anwar”.

Nallakarupan pada satu cermahnya di Permatang Pasir hari Jumaat mendedahkan Anwar telah mengambil wang sebanyak RM60 juta dari syarikat perjudian 4-nombor ekor, Magnum Corporation.

Pendedahan itu dibuat olehnya kerana beliau merasakan beliau perlu mendedahkan siapa Anwar sebenarnya sewaktu beliau berkuasa hingga sanggup mengambil wang dari sumber judi tetapi cuba menonjolkan imej dirinya seorang pemimpin yang Islamik.

Sementara itu Bernama melaporkan, Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak mencabar penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menjawab pendedahan yang dilakukan oleh bekas pengikut dan orang kanannya.

Katanya Anwar perlu memperjelaskan dakwaan yang dibuat oleh bekas Ketua Angkatan Muda PKR Mohamad Ezam Mohd Nor dan juga kawan rapatnya Datuk S. Nallakurappan.

Ezam pernah dipenjarakan demi mempertahankan Anwar tetapi sekarang beliau sendiri mendedahkan siapakah sebenarnya bekas pemimpinnya itu, katanya pada majlis jamuan makan malam MCA di Dewan Moral Uplifting.

"Begitulah juga dengan Datuk S. Nallakaruppan yang pernah dipenjarakan kerana Anwar tetapi hari ini Nallakaruppan sendiri mendedahkan bahawa Anwar pernah mengambil wang Magnum sebanyak RM60 juta.

"Ketiganya, Anwar masih perlu menjawab sumpah yang dilakukan oleh Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan (kes liwat) dan janganlah memutar-belitkan laporan perubatan (Pusrawi Mohd Saiful Bukhari)," katanya.

kzso - will anwar dare to sue ezam too?

Isu budak pembancuh kopi hangat di Permatang Pauh

Isu budak pembancuh kopi hangat di Permatang Pauh

1. Saiful Bukhari Azlan, budak pembancuh kopi Anwar akhirnya tetap menjadi perhatian di Permatang Pauh. Sepatutnya isu ini mudah ditepis dengan kepakaran pidato Anwar, namun rupa-rupanya isu itu masih menghantui Anwar, walaupun dua hari lagi hari mengundi.


2. Kalau tidak 'menghantui', sudah pasti tidak perlu diusung ustaz Ramlang Porigi (yang menjadi saksi sumpah) naik ke atas pentas PKR berceramah menyokong Anwar. Ustaz itu pula mendakwa beliau diarah diarah oleh 'pihak atasan' menjadi saksi sumpah Saiful. Katanya lagi ada empat orang imam yang menjadi saksi sumpah di Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan tempohari.


3. Adakah ustaz itu pula turut bersumpah di depan pengundi Permatang Pauh mengatakan sumpah budak pembancuh kopi itu salah ? TIDAK. Beliau kata beliau hanya menegur sebutan budak pembancuh kopi Anwar yang tersalah sebut sahaja. Lepas itu, beliau turut mendiamkan diri (mengiakan?) sebutan budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu hingga selesai majlis.


4. Adakah ustaz itu pula turut bertukar imej dari 'tok imam masjid' menjadi 'kempen manager politik Anwar' pula dengan memberi huraian terperinci menyokong teori konspirasi ? TIDAK. Ustaz itu berucap ringkas, beliau dakwa diarah oleh 'pihak atasan' untuk menjadi saksi kepada pembancuh kopi Anwar itu. Ustaz itu sendiri tidak menyebut nama siapakah 'orang atasan' yang telah mengarahkannya apatah lagi mampu menghurai teori konspirasi Anwar secara komplek. Ustaz itu sendiri mengakui beliau tidak mengenalpasti siapakah 'orang atasan' yang mengarahkannya itu.

5. Persoalan lanjut, sila baca komen blogger Akal Muda bertajuk "Imam dipolitikkan - mana satu yang betul? "


6. Baca pengakuan Ustaz Ramlang Porigi di Permatang Pauh, klik di sini


7. Jadi untuk apa ustaz itu diusung ke pentas ceramah PKR, kalau tidak semata-mata menunjukkan untuk menunjukkan 'isu budak pembancuh kopi' menghantui Anwar. Kalau mahu seret ustaz yang jadi saksi sumpah, sepatutnya Ustaz Anwar dan PKR hereta keempat-empatnya sekali naik ke pentas politik itu. Ustaz Ramlang Porigi hanya salah seorang, mana tiga orang saksi lagi? Adakah dengan kehadiran ustaz itu boleh membersihkan semula semua sumpahan budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu ?


8. Untuk lebih berkesan lagi sepatutnya Anwar dan PKR heret bekas budak pembancuh kopinya itu naik ke pentas menafikan sumpahnya tempoh hari. Kena tuan badan yang bersumpah menafikan sendiri, bukannya diwakili oleh pihak lain. Ustaz itu hanya menjadi saksi sahaja dan tidak bersumpah pun di pentas ceramah PKR mengatakan apa yang diucapkan adalah benar.


Teori konspirasi?


1. Bermakna kehadiran ustaz Ramlang Porigi masih belum gagal merungkai teori konspirasi yang telah diwar-warkan oleh Anwar. Ustaz itu hanya berjaya memberitahu bahawa beliau tidak bersalah dan beliau diarahkan hadir. Itu sahaja kejayaannya setelah sebelum ini diasak bermati-matian oleh tranungkite.


2. Adakah ini bermaksud kehadiran ustaz itu ke pentas PKR semata-mata untuk membersihkan namanya dan bukan untuk membersihkan nama Anwar?


3. Bagaimana pula hujah sokongan untuk memperkasakan teori konspirasi Anwar ? Adakah masih belum terjawab hingga ke hari ini ?


4. Lagipun, teori konspirasi Anwar telah berubah-ubah. Pada mulanya beliau mengatakan isu liwat itu adalah konspirasi pejabat Najib. Setelah didakwa, beliau menukar pertuduhan mengatakan konspirasi pejabat Pak Lah pula.


5. Barangkali selepas dijatuhkan hukuman, siapa pula yang menjadi mangsa Anwar?. Kenapa beliau sering berubah-ubah tuduhan ?


Sumpah budak pembancuh kopi Anwar


1. Benar atau tidak sumpah budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu, dia telah serahkan kepada Allah Taala yang menghukumnya. Itu urusan dia dengan Allah. Allah Lebih Mengetahui benar atau tidak lafaz yang telah diucapkan oleh budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu.


2. Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan telah mengesahkan lafaz yang diucapkan oleh budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu adalah betul . Mufti Perlis pula menegur perbuatan Saiful memegang Al Quran yang dianggap salah, tetapi mengesahkan lafaznya betul. Bekas Pengerusi Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan, Datuk Dr Ismail Ibrahim pula mengatakan kedua-duanya perbuatan dan lafaz adalah betul.


3. Bermakna terdapat perbezaan antara lafaz dan perbuatan. Perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu tidak menyalahi akidah dan tidak boleh membatalkan lafaz yang telah diucapkannya. Kesimpulannya ketiga-tiga tokoh agama yang disebut di atas sebulat suara bersetuju lafaz yang diucapkan budak pembancuh kopi Anwar itu adalah sah di sisi agama.



Sumpah hantui Anwar ?


1. Budak pembancuh kopi itu benar-benar menghantui Anwar. Dari mula kehilangannya. Dari laporan polis, hingga memaksa Anwar berlindung di kedutaan asing. Apa ni..ada badi ke di antara budak pembancuh kopi dengan tuannya ?


2. Tidak semena-mena Azizah letak jawatan kerusi Permatang Pauh, walhal baru sahaja menang enam bulan lalu. Belum sampai setahun, kena mengundi sekali lagi ?


3. Anwar pula bertanding di kawasan kubu kuatnya. Kalau dikira logik, Anwar tak perlu turun padang, kempen siang malam,dan sepatutnya Anwar hanya perlu hadir semasa penamaan calon dan selepas itu beliau boleh naik pesawat ke Amerika kerana kawasan itu merupakan kubu kuatnya. Tetapi kenapa pula Anwar perlu rayu undi dari rumah ke rumah ? Tidak percayakah beliau bahawa kawasan itu kubu kuatnya?


4. Masih terbayang lagi, bagaimana Anwar memperlekehkan calon PAS di Pengkalan Pasir Kelantan dalam pilihan raya kecil tahun lalu. Anwar hanya hadir sekali dalam ceramah besar di Stadium Pasir Mas, lepas itu beliau tinggalkan calon PAS terkial-kial seorang diri mempertahankan maruahnya. Anwar beri alasan ada urusan yang lebih penting di luar negara. walhal sebelum berangkat ke luar negara, Anwar masih sempat ke Sarawak untuk berbincang politik PKR di negeri itu. Apa ni..terlalu pentingkah urusan di luar negara, hingga tak boleh tunda selepas pilihan raya kecil ? Itukah erti persahabatan Anwar kepada rakan pakatan ?


5. Kalau calon PAS bertanding di Pengkalan Pasir, Anwar kata sibuk dengan urusan luar negara. Kalau calon PKR bertanding di Ijok, Anwar sanggup batalkan semua urusan di luar negara, semata-mata untuk turun padang bersama sahabatnya Khalid Ibrahim di Ijok. Apa ni..double standard.


6. Untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut kisah Anwar di Pengkalan Pasir, klik di sini


7. Sepatutnya isu sumpah ini tidak patut menghantui Anwar, jika awal-awal lagi beliau tidak ambil budak pembancuh kopi itu bekerja dengannya. Beliau sepatutnya tidak perlu membawa pembancuh kopi itu makan angin ke luar negara dan sepatutnya tidak perlu membawanya ke kondominium yang didakwa sebagai tempat kejadian.


8. Sepatutnya budak pembancuh kopi itu jangan sesekali diberi bebanan tugas. Tugasnya cukup setakat itu, sekadar budak tukang bancuh kopi!. Begitu juga, kalau sekadar rakan bermain tenis, sepatutnya sekadar teman sepermainan tenis sahaja. Jika lebih daripada tugas itu maka akan berlaku sumpah Saiful dan pendedahan Nallakarupan!


9. Persoalannya, siapakah yang silap?


Anwar perlu bersumpah ?


1. Semakin banyak desakan daripada orang ramai agar Anwar turut bersumpah untuk membersihkan dirinya sebenar-benar bersih. Kalau tidak, sumpah budak pembancuh tehnya itu akan terus menghantui. Bukan setakat dirinya malah mungkin juga pengundi Permatang Pauh.



2. Soalnya adakah Anwar percaya, menang atau kalah kerana faktor sumpah ?. Mengenali Anwar sebelum ini, beliau tidak percayakan sesiapa kecuali dirinya sahaja. Beliau memang hebat dan sudah terbukti kehebatan pidatonya, soalnya, adakah pengundi kali ini menilai dari sudut kehebatan pidato sahaja atau pertimbangan lain, termasuk akhlak?


3. Malah kehebatan pidato Anwar hanya pada intonansinya sahaja, tetapi dari segi isi masih boleh dipertikaikan. Apatah lagi kalau mahu diukur dari segi kata nista dan fitnah tanpa bukti. Malah kalau direnung dalam-dalam, terpancar diwajahnya perasaan taajub kepada dirinya yang melampau. Beliaulah orang yang paling hebat dan paling berkuasa. Orang lain semuanya salah. Bukankah itu sifat terkeji iaitu taajub, riak dan sombong?


4. Sama ada Anwar nak bersumpah atau tidak itu adalah urusan beliau. Orang lain tidak boleh memaksa. Tetapi Anwar juga tidak boleh memaksa orang lain bersetuju seratus peratus dengan apa yang diucapkannya.


5. Sebagaimana orang lain tidak perlu pertikai hak asasinya, Anwar juga tidak perlu menceroboh hak orang lain. Buangkan tabiat menggunakan nama orang lain untuk menyelamatkan diri sendiri.


6. Tidak perlu guna nama ustaz Qardawi, untuk mempertahankan diri, kerana tuan badan tidak berada di Permatang Pauh. Tidak perlu guna nama Mutfi Perlis untuk mempertahankan diri, ketika ditanya wartawan di mahkamah syariah. Anwar kata beliau telefon sendiri Mufti Perlis dan katanya Mutfi Perlis menafikan buat kenyataan ke atas dirinya, sedangkan semua orang menonton dan memahami ceramah Mufti perlis di youtube.


7. Tidak perlu guna nama ustaz Hadi untuk menyelamatkan diri ketika ditanya wartawan Malaysiakini, kenapa anda sokong Forum Memeluk Islam. Anwar kata, beliau telah berbincang dengan ustaz Hadi dan ustaz Hadi turut sokong forum itu diadakan secara tertutup. Tidak perlu babitkan nama ustaz Hadi kerana beliau tiada semasa wawancara dengan Malaysiakini itu.


8. Sepatutnya Anwar tidak perlu menggunakan nama orang lain yang tidak kena mengena semata-mata untuk menyelamatkan dirinya. Sendiri buat, sendiri tanggung!

Esok bentuk kerajaan, turun harga minyak ?

1. Kempen Anwar seperti biasa laungkan slogan 'esok bentuk kerajaan, turunkan harga mintyak!. Maksudnya 'esok kalau saya jadi PM, saya akan turunkan harga minyak!


2. Tetapi lebih Islamik, jika dikatakan, 'Insya Allah, jika saya ditakdirkan menjadi PM, saya akan berusaha sedaya upaya menurunkan harga minyak!. 'Saya sendiri tidak boleh meramalkan bilakah tarikh saya menjadi PM, kerana semua itu ketentuanNYA'. Itulah ayat yang digunakan dalam usrah ketika menubuhkan ABIM dahulu.


3. Tetapi Anwar sekarang bukan Anwar zaman ABIM dahulu. Anwar sekarang adalah 'Muslim Moderate' yang yakin segala-galanya beliau mampu buat. Boleh ramal bila bakal menjadi PM dan diletakkan tarikh spesifik, 16 Sept. Noktah!


4. Diandaikan Anwar berjaya bentuk kerajaan, dan diandaikan juga berjaya jadi PM, adakah Anwar mampu menurunkan harga minyak? Walaupun andaian ini seperti bunyi Mat Jenin, tetapi kita bayangkan mungkin 'angan-angan' Mat Jenin jadi kenyataan.


5. Pada saya, Anwar mampu melakukan dengan syarat beliau dilantik jadi PM, kerana kuasa mutlak bergantung kepada dirinya. Pada tahun 1997, beliau hanya TPM, sebab itu, beliau gagal untuk membuat keputusan agar Malaysia menerima dana Yahudi IMF untuk menyelesaikan kemelut ekonomi ketika itu.


6. Langkah pertama, Anwar sebagai PM akan meminjam daripada Bank Dunia dan IMF, kerana beliau pernah bekerja di kedua-dua institusi yang dikuasai permodalan Yahudi itu.

Lihat betapa akrabnya Tian Chua, Ketua Penerangan PKR dengan pemodal Yahudi yang dianggap penyangak matawang yang merundumkan ekonomi Malaysia 1997, George Soros. Kalau orang yang pertama kali jumpa atau tak akrab hanya mampu bersalam secara hadapan dengan antara Yahudi terkaya di dunia itu. Tetapi cara Ketua Penerangan PKR itu duduk di belakang George Soros (sambil gosok belakang Soros?) membayang hubungan mereka sudah lama bertaut. Kalau Ketua Penerangan boleh seakrab ini, bagaimana pula hubungan Soros dengan Ketua Umum (de facto) PKR, tentu lebih rapat lagi. Lagipun, Anwar terlibat dengan satu NGO dinamakan ICG yang dibiayai sepenuhnya oleh Yahudi tersohor itu

7. Langkah kedua, Anwar akan meminjam daripada mana-mana tabung dana Yahudi di Amerika atau Open Institute, kepunyaan Yahudi penyangak matawang bernama George Soros kerana Anwar terlibat bersamanya dalam International Crisis Group (ICG). Maknanya semua pedagang Yahudi di Amerika adalah kenalan Anwar.

8. Bagaimana dengan saudagar Islam di Timur Tengah ?. Anwar pernah sebut dahulu bahawa yayasannya Foundation For The Future tiada kaitan dengan Amerika Syarikat, tetapi apabila terbongkar di website Jabatan Negara Amerika, bahawa yayasan yang dipengerusikan Anwar itu merupakan boneka Amerika, Anwar tidak dapat menyorok lalu, lalu pilih senjata terakhir iaitu letak jawatan!


9. Anwar juga pernah jaja di seluruh Malaysia, bahawa UIA adalah jasanya dan saudagar Arab mahu melabur wang kepada universiti itu. Tetapi hingga sekarang tiadapun sumbangan daripada pelabur Arab yang dimaksudkan itu hingga UIA yang asalnya berdaftar di bawah ROC terpaksa ditanggung sepenuhnya perbelanjaan oleh Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. Sepatutnya UIA jadi IPTS bertaraf antarabangsa, terpaksa pula jadi UIAM, bertaraf IPTA dan antarabangsa.


10. Bermakna, satu-satu cara Anwar untuk menurunkan harga minyak dengan cara berhutang dengan IMF dan Bank Dunia.


11. Jadi, Anwar tidak kisah soal hutang piutang, kerana cita-citanya hanya untuk menjadi PM sahaja. Apa nak jadi kepada negara selepas itu bukan urusannya. Soal hutang, itu mesti ditanggung oleh setiap rakyat jelata. Itulah maksudnya KETUANAN RAKYAT!


Permatang Pauh bakal mengundi sekali lagi ?


1. Sekiranya Anwar menang di Permatang Pauh pada 26 Ogos ini, para pengundi akan menghadapi risiko berkemungkinan bakal mengundi sekali lagi.


2. Ini berdasarkan fakta, Anwar dipilih sebagai Ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh tetapi dalam masa sama Anwar menghadapi pertuduhan di mahkamah.


3. Mengundi sudah selesai, tetapi kes mahkamah belum selesai. Bagaimana jika di mahkamah nanti Anwar kalah, dan beliau dijatuhkan hukuman penjara. Bermakna kerusi Permatang Pauh sekali lagi terpaksa dikosongkan!

Kes liwat Anwar 1998 : Dari kiri Anwar, Azizan Abu Bakar (bekas pemandu) dan Sukma Darmawan (adik angkat). Semuanya sekitar orang terdekat Anwar. Kini didakwa pula dengan budak pembancuh kopi Anwar.

4. Lagipun peluang untuk Anwar tewas di mahkamah lebih cerah. Ini diakui sendiri oleh para peguambelanya. Sesuatu kes pertuduhan yang sama akan terlebih dahulu dirujuk kepada kes yang sama.


5. Kes lama, Anwar tewas. Anwar dibebaskan pada 2004 pun hanya selepas dua kali proses rayuan. Maknanya Anwar telah didapati bersalah dan terpaksa merayu!


6. Sekiranya berdasarkan senerio ini, peluang untuk para pengundi mengundi sekali lagi amat cerah jika ditakdirkan Anwar menang pada 26 Ogos ini. Bermakna dalam setahun, Permatang Pauh terpaksa mengundi tiga kali ?


7. Akhir kata kepada semua pengundi Permatang Pauh. Selamat mengundi, buatlah keputusan secara bijaksana.AIDC25 Ogos 2008


Baca artikel berkaitan :
1. Misteri hubungan Anwar & Saiful ?
2. Anwar tumbang kerana seorang lelaki ?
3. Kes Liwat : Perlukan Anwar minta sokongan badan antarabangsa ?
4. Anwar : Kenapa 'berlindung' di kedutaan asing ?
5. Anwar : Antara Pertuduhan Mahkamah dan Permatang Pauh

kzso - semoga pengundi dan penduduk permatang pauh mengundi dengan bijaksana demi agama, bangsa dan negara; bukan demi kepentingan nafsu-nafsi seorang individu

Bro AnWar..Downfall Of A Legend or D Masquerader....

Bro AnWar..Downfall Of A Legend or D Masquerader....

from conspiracy theorist website

Hopefully dis is true..heheh..

wat can I say.. heard d Whisperers saying dat bro AnWar is gonna b history as thr r inside supporters of PKR who's doin sum quiet undrgroun movement to 'Kaleh Tangan' on bro AnWar dis P.Pauh by-E,

heheh..wow..dats really gonna b history n d beginning of d end for PR or d end of a beginning for bro AnWar...

i pray dis is true & if it dus it will happen wth a humiliating defeat for d power craze AnWar Ibrahim.. d Master of Deception defeated by his own deception..

lets see how d PKR ppl r goin to handle dis info..so rite now my crazy assumption but possible scenario on wats next will be, PAS vote Akim n leave PKR members wth sum sentimental Chinese & Indians left..

den now PKR members behind d back of bro AnWar is gonna make a killing feat dat will b written in history as d PARTY RAKYAT dat throws deir own de-facto leader out in d spirit of rakyat as dey realise bro AnWar is doin 'it' for personal & bigger agenda wth d neocons..

heheh..wat can I say...as for d sentimental indians & chinese sum will vote UMNO again upon learning d 'Kaleh Tangan'movement goin on..

wats left to support bro AnWar will b d DAPsies n Hidrafiq(short for Hindraf Munafiq)...

to fellow 'True Malaysian' support d current coalition party dat governs us but over throw d leaders d lead us wrongly to destruction...

make D.Ariff wins & den lets put PLah or YAB DS Abdullah Hj.Ahmad Badawi out from d leadership helm...

lets all try our best to support YAM T.Razaleigh Hamzah up as d PM wth eithr DS Najib, DS Rais or Muhyiddin as d DPM..

lets foster our unity as Malaysian of coz aftr fostering d unity of d Malays first & foremost.. if d Malays are not strong & united den I fear d Non Malays will suffer most as d country will b in chaotic situation wen Malays r weak..

history have proven so pls maintain d social contracts wth honor..

d younger generations of chinese,indians n Malays shud ask deir older generations wats its like an aftermath of each social unrest n etchnic instability cud do..

wat is worrying me now is d attitude of a bai dats playing wth d sentiment of d Malays.. wat d funk is he tinking!! duh wat an oxymoron dat is to have as a lawyer..

i wudn b surprise if one dat one of d prisoner/accused dat he is defending will kill him if dat person had taken it as a sentimental issue due to d fact he is a Malay..den wat will happen?? a racial unrest like wats happening in d west & now spreading to othr continents wth multi racial citizen...??

wat next??

We must never forget for as long as d Illuminati is aroun we will forever b challenged by d western civilization wch has unfortunately been lured to d illuminati's concept of New World Order..

D CIA support d gay movement for wat??

do sum googling n research, or I mite post sumting bout it later..

A lot of ppl dun like d Pokka or Sesumpah.. so can we trust any1 who hav d traits of a Pokka,..heheh...

wat can I say..u decide.. till den we'll c wat more theories lies ahead..more conspiracies bro AnWar..??!! i wudn b surprised bro AnWar's gonna do d untinkable...heheh..

u gess rite..'RUN FOR UR LIFE'......

have u seen how Pokka runs..p.s. click on bro AnWar's Pokka face to read wat woz said or check Small Talk

kzso - we'll wait for 26th August 2008.... the result..................

Swearing By The Quran Strikes Fear Among Malays

Swearing By The Quran Strikes Fear Among Malays

PENANG, Aug 24 (Bernama) --

The Malays only fear two things in life - swearing by the Quran in the name of Allah and the consumption of pork.

"If you are not scared then swear by the Quran" or "I am willing to swear by the Quran" are phrases often uttered by Malays when challenging another to prove his innocence.

Normally, those challenged to swear will not dare take it up for fear of retribution by Allah.

When was the last time we heard or had seen the Malays swear "Wallahi, Wabillahi, Watallahi" at an official ceremony to prove an accusation?

More significantly, a "sumpah laknat" (mubahalah), or swearing in the face of divine retribution.

This is the character of the Malay Muslims, something unique compared to Muslims from other regions including those in the Malay archipelago.

As such, it rarely happened except once in the 1960s when the late PAS president and Kelantan Menteri Besar Datuk Mohd Asri Muda and Tunku Abdul Rahman swore by the Quran over an accusation made by the late premier.

Umno veteran and Penang Malay Association president Datuk Mohd Yusof Latiff said Tunku had accused Asri of receiving foreign funding to topple the government.
"Asri denied the accusation and challenged Tunku to swear in a mosque to prove that he was telling the truth.

"The Tunku accepted the challenge and swore in the Masjid Zahir, Alor Star witnessed by PAS representative the late Yusof Rawa.

Asri denied the accusation by swearing in Kota Baharu mosque witnessed by Umno representative Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah.

In this context and socio-cultural background, the swearing by Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 23, at the Federal Territory Mosque in Kuala Lumpur on Aug 15 is seen by Malays as a serious matter since he was bold enough to prove his accusation.

Certain quarters particularly Anwar supporters may claim that the swearing by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's former aide was politically motivated aimed at reducing his chances of winning the Permatang Pauh by-election.

Saiful said it was not politically motivated and that by swearing by the Quran he wanted to prove he was telling the truth.

Anwar, the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) adviser is being challenged by Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah of Barisan Nasional (BN) and Hanafi Mamat of Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia (AKIM).

On Friday, Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was shown on television swearing in the name of Allah in the Guar Perahu mosque, Permatang Pauh denying that he and his wife were involved in the murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shariibu.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Islamic Scholars Defend Validity Of Swearing By Saiful

BUKIT MERTAJAM, Aug 24 (Bernama) --

Former National Fatwa Council chairman Datuk Dr Ismail Ibrahim said swearing in the name of Allah while holding the Quran to state truth should not be equated with the Christian way of swearing on the Bible.

He said in Islam, what was important was for the person to swear on his belief, and holding the Quran or not while doing so did not involve the question of his faith in Islam.

Therefore, Ismail said, the swearing in the mosque by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, had fulfilled the condition on swearing in the Islamic way between a servant of God and his Creator.

"The swearing is between him (Mohd Saiful) and Allah. If he had done it with sincerity, others should not dispute it," he said when contacted for his comments on the polemics among ulamas on the swearing on the Quran by Mohd Saiful that he was sodomised by Anwar.

Ismail said Mohd Saiful had met the condition by saying in his oath, "Wallahi, Wabillahi, Watallahi", so the question of its validity did not arise at all.
He said whether Mohd Saiful held the Quran or not when taking the oath was not an issue and so should not be disputed.

"If we eat using fork and spoon like the Christians do, it does not make us Christians. Whatever we do depends on our intention."

He said as Malaysia practised civil law, the alleged sodomy case involving Mohd Saiful and Anwar would proceed in accordance with this law.

Ismail said it was not unusual for ulamas to have differing opinions on religious matters.

Meanwhile, Perlis Mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin has come out in defence of his stand that the "sumpah mubahalah" (swearing in the name of God) needed not necessarily be made in the syariah court.

He said the ulamas' different views on the "sumpah laknat" (swearing in the face of divine retribution) by Mohd Saiful had resulted in public confusion, with some quarters manipulating the issue.

"Some are of the opinion that the swearing must be done in the syariah court and that truth be proven by calling four witnesses," he said.

The alleged sodomy case involving Anwar has been a hot issue during campaigning in the Permatang Pauh by-election, with a pamphlet carrying the different views of ulamas on Mohd Saiful's "sumpah mubahalah", being circulated in the constituency.

The pamphlet also carries the view of Cordoba University president Prof Dr Taha Al Jabir Al-Alwani which supports that the case be referred under the syariah provision of "qazaf" (slander).

A lecturer with Universiti Sains Malaysia's Department of Islamic Studies, Assoc Prof Dr Mohamad Radzi Othman, meanwhile, said the question of whether the "sumpah mubahalah" was made in the mosque or outside should not arise.

"In mubahalah, the intention is to make a statement and the place where it is made is not an issue."

On Mohd Saiful holding the Quran when swearing in the name of God, Mohamad Radzi said it was also not wrong as it was not a required condition.

"Maybe he was under duress and needed to hold the Quran to derive strength. So, it was not wrong and should not be disputed. He only wanted people to accept what he swore."

Asked whether sodomy cases should be tried under the law on "zina" (illicit sex), he said in the case of "zina", a person who accused another of committing the offence would require four witnesses.

"But in the case of sodomy, the ulamas have differing opinions. Some say it's not the same, so bringing four witnesses to prove the allegation is not a prerequisite."

On PAS' deputy spiritual leader Datuk Dr Haron Din that Mohd Saiful's sodomy case was a case of Li'An, he said this was only applicable to a married couple.

He suggested that ulamas or scholars explain the religious rulings clearly on the matter to avoid confusing the public.

kzso - again, will the majlis ulama' come out with a fatwa on this. do not let the ummah split becaus of this issue