ANUGERAH SETAN BUAT AZIZAH, AZMIN DAN SAMSIDAR..........TAHNIAH KONSEP PERKONGSIAN PINTAR DIAMALKAN OLEH MEREKA.............BERKONGSI RAHSIA, KUASA,IS

ANUGERAH SETAN BUAT AZIZAH, AZMIN DAN SAMSIDAR..........TAHNIAH KONSEP PERKONGSIAN PINTAR DIAMALKAN OLEH MEREKA.............BERKONGSI RAHSIA, KUASA,ISTERI,SUAMI,ANAK,HARTA,KASIH SAYANG,WANG RINGGIT,KELASSSSS

‘Dalam Bulan Ramadhan Pun Anwar Ketagih Meliwat’ – Bekas Mangsa

Mat Jambu rupanya patutlah Juburin pening lalat, Bulan puasa pun nak balun, memang bapak segala setan Nu War ni. Suruh bersumpah gigil, masa membuntut tak takut pulak.

AIDCNews – 24/01/11 – Bekas Imam Besar Masjid Negara, Ustaz Taib Azamuddin Mohd Taib terkejut dengan pendedahan bekas mangsa liwat, Hairani Hj Nahfis yang juga bekas penulis pidato Anwar yang mendapat bayaran RM14,000 sebulan itu menceritakan bahawa dalam bulan Ramadhan pun Anwar masih ketagih untuk melakukan aktiviti homoseksual.

Hairani : Ada kadang kala bulan puasa siangnya puasa,malamnya terawih saya balik terawih, malam kan, dia (Anwar) telefon jugak suruh saya datang,(ke rumah Anwar di Bukit Damansara) kita dah terawih kita puasa.

Taib : Allah. Hah..ha..

Hairani : ..dah bersihkan diri, kemudian dah.., malam cuba tambahkan ibadat lagi, terawih.., balik dia ajak lagi, kan. Saya tau kalau tiba rumah dia tu, mesti akan jadi benda tu (liwat)..

Taib : Hem..hem..

Hairani : ..ni kita bulan puasa kan, jadi, saya bagi macam-macam alasan lagilah. Saya kata mak saya ada kat rumah lah, mak saya tak sihat, saya nak jaga. Sampai dia feduplah. Itulah keadaannya kan,.. beberapa insiden yang berlaku antara saya dengan dia.

Taib : Jadi berapa kali yang..?

Hairani : Lebih daripada tiga kali..

Taib : Lebih daripada tiga kali..?

Hairani : Saya tak dapat menolaknyalah, tiap-tiap kali memang saya tak rela, saya tak pernah keluarkan air mani saya. Tak pernah naik pun, apa namanya ni..

Taib : Ya..

Dalam pengakuan bekas mangsa liwat itu, Ustaz Taib Azamuddin masih lagi bertugas sebagai Imam Besar Masjid Negara. Pengakuan itu dibuat di pejabat Ustaz Taib di Masjid Negara selepas pemecatan Anwar pada tahun 1998.

Menurut mangsa itu, dia diliwat lebih daripada tiga kali bermula dari tahun 1994 di rumah kediaman Anwar, yang dianggap ofis peribadi yang terletak bersebelahan dengan bilik perpustakaan.

Menurutnya, dia mengenali Anwar sejak masih belajar lagi, tetapi tiada apa-apa kejadian homoseksual kerana hubungan secara profesional. Mangsa liwat yang juga bekas pensyarah salah sebuah universiti tempatan itu juga turut mengenali adik angkat Anwar, Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja.

Pada satu hari dalam tahun 1994, Sukma menelefon Hairani untuk berjumpa di kedai karpetnya di Bangsar. Dalam perbualan itu Sukma memberitahu abangnya, Anwar mahu berjumpa.

“Kemudian saya tanya pasal apa? Dia (Sukma) kata memang dia dah lama nak jumpa. Mesti ada sebab nak jumpa, kan? Lepas tu dia kata, datang aje laa dia kata, datang nak bagi kerja ke, apa ke.

“Sebab masa tu memang saya ada, bagitau dia (Sukma) sebelum tu yang saya nak cari kerja baru. Kemudian dia kata datang aje. Saya tak tahu macam mana, hati saya berat nak pergi, berat nak jumpa..” kata Hairani.

Dalam pertemuan itu, Hairani menyatakan persetujuan untuk berjumpa dengan Anwar. Sukma memberitahu dia akan menelefonnya untuk mengesahkan tempat pertemuan dengan Anwar itu.

Pada sebelah malamnya, Sukma sekali lagi menelefon Hairani. Dia meminta Hairani berjumpanya pada keesokan harinya, sebelah petang, di Medan Damansara, Pusat Bandar Damansara. Dia meminta Hairani meninggalkan keretanya di situ dan dia akan datang mengambil menaiki keretanya untuk berjumpa dengan Anwar.

Dalam perbualan itu, Sukma memberikan telefonnya kepada Anwar untuk bercakap sendiri dengan Anwar.

“Dalam telefon tu dia (Anwar) kata kenapa susah sangat nak jumpa dia? Dia melawak-lawaklah. Tak de.. saya kata saya seganlah nak jumpa dengan orang-orang besar, kan. Dia kata, tak de nak segan-segan apa-apanya. Saya pun macam dia jugak, dia kata. Dia kata, oklah, esok Insyaallah kita jumpalah”, katanya.

Menurutnya pada keesokannya, dia menunggu Sukma di tempat yang dijanjikan dan Sukma datang mengambilnya serta membawa ke rumah kediaman Anwar di Bukit Damansara, No 8, Jalan Setiamurni 1, Bukit Damansara.

Sukma membawa Hairani masuk ke rumah itu melalui pintu dapur dan dibawa ke bilik khasnya. Di rumah kediaman Anwar di Bukit Damansara, Sukma telah diberi keistimewaan mendapat satu bilik khas di tingkat atas rumah tersebut.

Tidak lama selepas itu, Anwar turut memasuki bilik Sukma itu, berjabat tangan dengan Hairani dan memeluknya dalam jangka masa yang lama.

Ketika itu Ustaz Taib Azamuddin tertarik dengan kenyataan ‘pelukan yang lama’ dan bertanyakan adakah tiada sesiapa ahli keluarga Anwar, selain Sukma pada masa itu.

Taib : Makna pelukan tu lama?

Hairani : Ha’ah lama.. Dia kata, “..punya lama saya dok tunggu nih, bertahun-tahun sejak I kenal you lagi”.. Saya rasa tak sedap laa bila dia kata macam tu.. kemudian, dia terus peluk saya.

Taib : Keluarga yang lain tak de?

Hairani : Tak de.

Taib : Di rumah tu?

Hairani : Di bawah tu ada, pembantu dia.

Taib : Maknanya isteri ke, anak dia semua tak de?

Hairani : Tak de. Mungkin diaorang ada kat dalam rumah, tapi tak jumpalah.

Taib : Hem..hem..

Sekali lagi Ustaz Taib Azamuddin mencelah apabila Hairani memceritakan Sukma turut berada di dalam bilik itu, semasa Anwar memeluknya.

Taib : Maknanya 3 oranglah waktu tu?

Hairani : 3 orang.

Taib : Hem..hem..

Hairani : Kemudian, dia ajak saya duduk atas katil, dia pegang macam tu (menunjukkan tangan sebelah kanan Anwar memaut bahu).. dan berbual-bual sikit, dia dok ulang-ulang.. dia kata “lama tunggu, juai mahal, susah nak jumpalah.” Dia tanya khabar semua. Tangan mula berjalan, tangan tu.. teruslah terjadi benda tu dia tindih saya.., emm.. berlakulah hubungan homoseks ini. Saya nak tolak tak boleh.

Taib : Waktu tu Sukma masih ada?

Hairani : (mengangguk..)

Taib : Oo.. dia tak keluar?

Hairani : Selepas tu, masa tengah tu dia ada laa, cuma dia masuk bilik air, kemudian dia masuk balik, memang sepanjang tu memang dia ada. Sebab dia duduk di tepi bilik tempat kejadian tu. Kira macam dia tunggu di situ lah. Saya pun tak tau apa-apa, tak membantah apa-apa, tak de lah macam memekik “jangan”.. dia siapa, kan? Lepas tu.., tapi memang saya tak ada nafsu langsung untuk melakukannya.

Taib : Ya lah.. (mengangguk-angguk)

Menurutnya sepanjang aktiviti homoseksual itu, Anwar turut komplen kepadanya kerana ‘bendanya’ tidak keras. Hairani mengakui bendanya tidak keras kerana dia tidak bernafsu dan terkejut. Selepas selesai aktiviti homoseksual itu, Anwar mengajaknya mandi bersama untuk membersihkan badan.

Hairani : Benda ni lepas selang dua tiga hari tu, dia telefon suruh datang sekali lagi. Saya tak tahu nak buat apa. Nak datang takut jadi lagi. Tak datang takut apa jadi pulak, kan. Sampai benda ni berlaku dua tiga kalilah.., sampai kadang-kadang sampai saya bagi macam-macam alasanlah, sampai dia muak dengan macam-macam yang dibagi.. dia selalu telefon sayalah.

Sampai dua tiga kali cerita pasal benda tu, saya tak boleh terima lagi.. benda tu. Terutama bercakap dengan orang macam tu tentang perkara berkaitan dengan hubungan seks. Tapi itulah hakikatnya, itulah realitinya yang betul-betul berlaku. Saya cuba keluar daripada.. emm.. ada satu masa tu saya dah takut sangat. Nak lari daripada dia. Satu malam dia telefon suruh saya datang ke rumah dia, kan.

Saya malam tu saya tak mahu langsung kan.., saya rasa diri saya kotor kan. Takut nak pergi.. takut, tak pergi takut, sampai saya, saya pergi jugak ke rumah dia, tapi on the way saya telefon dia. Saya kata ada orang ikut saya.

Taib : Ya.. ya..

Hairani : Saya menipu sebab saya tak mahu pergi ke rumah dia kan. Jadi saya create.

Taib : Di Damansara tu lah..?

Hairani : Di Damansara.. (mengangguk), kata ada orang ikut saya sebab saya takut. Dia kata apa ni, bawak terus kereta..dia kata nanti dia suruh polis tembak siapa orang ikut.

Taib : Oo..

Ustaz Taib Azamuddin juga sekali lagi mahu mendapat pengesahan Hairani adakah aktiviti homoseksual itu dilakukan di antara Hairani dengan Anwar atau bergilir-gilir tiga orang, termasuk Sukma.

Taib : Dak, minta maaf cakap ni, minta maaflah cakap kalau saya mencelah . Ni secara analyticalnya. Cara ni.. dia nak mintak bergilir ke atau dia sorang je?

Hairani : Dia sorang.

Taib : Oo.. dia sorang je la. Maknanya dialah yang ada keghairahan, aktif, apa semua tu dialah maknanya?

Hairani : Tapi dia ada suruh saya buat jugak, tapi saya tak boleh sebab benda tu tak de.

Taib : Ya lah, memanglah kita tak.., ye lah benda tu, benda tu bukan boleh buat-buat..

Menurut Hairani, kejadian liwat itu berlaku tanpa kerelaannya tetapi sukar untuk menyakinkan orang lain mempercayainya termasuk isterinya.

Hairani : Dia ni pada saya, saya anggap dia macam hero saya. Isteri saya pun puji dia, dan dia pun orang pemimpin sayalah, pemimpin masa depan, anak cucu saya, saya ingatlah. Tiba-tiba ini berlaku pada saya. Apa yang dia buat pada saya jadi, rasa segan tu ada laa, takut ada.., macam-macam perasaan.

Saya cuba bersihkan diri beberapa kali tak tahulah adakah, nak mintak pandangan Ustaz, adakah perbuatan saya tu, Tuhan.. Tuhan masih terima keampunan orang macam saya ni.. masih mengampunkan orang macam saya ni lah, boleh tak saya bertaubat, dan taubat saya diterima dalam keadaan apa yang telah saya lakukan.

Taib : Dia, dalam hal yang begini, ialah, yang saya setakat apa yang boleh saya faham daripada cerita tu setakat ini. Berlakunya benda ni di luar kerelaan kita, dan apa tu. Hampir-hampir seolah macam memaksalah.
Cuma, bentuk paksaan tu secara yang tu, bawak kita menjadi tersepit, serba salah. Yang akhir, sudahnya kita terpaksa menurut.. dari apa yang, yang kemahuan itu. Jadi dari segi, wallahu’alam lah..

Hairani : Memang.. memang saya.., hidup saya runsing, sebab itulah kan sampai dia sedikit sebanyak meninggalkan kesan hubungan saya dengan isteri saya lepas dua tiga tahun, setahun selepas saya apa namanya ni.. berkahwin, kemudian baru enam bulan saya berkahwin benda ni berlaku, jadi isteri saya tak..,

Bila saya cerita bagitau betul-betul, dia susah nak terima hakikat macam mana seorang lelaki boleh memaksa lelaki lain melakukan hubungan seks tanpa gunakan pisau ke, apa ke, tapi kita rasa macam kita terpaksa melakukannya. Jadi dia tidak boleh menerima hakikat. Tapi hakikatnya benda tu berlaku, memang dia tak gunakan pisau ke, apa ke. Dato’ Seri tak gunakan pisau ke apa, tapi, dia control saya dari segi mental, saya tak boleh nak buat apa..

Taib : Ya.. ya.. kita tau

Hairani : ..tak boleh nak elak, tak boleh nak tolak.

Taib : Tu kuasa minda boleh.

Hairani : Yang itu yang susah saya nak terangkan pada isteri saya, dan dia tak boleh terima tu, dan dia tak.. dia masih kesal kenapa saya tak cerita pada dia sebelum kami kahwin. Walaupun benda ni berlaku empat lima tahun sebelum kami berjumpa pun, kan.

Ikutilah pengakuan seterusnya di AIDC Reveal.

Michael Backman : Walaupun Bebas 2004, Mahkamah Tetap Sahkan Anwar Adalah Gay

Frasa ‘Anwar Lakukan Homoseksual di Tivoli Villa’ Termaktub Di Mahkamah

20 TAHUN DOH WEiIii...

20 TAHUN DOH WEiIii...

hakikat PAS dlm Pakatan...

Lim Kit Siang & Karpal Singh – cakap tak serupa bikin

Posted on January 25, 2011 by jebatmustdie

I find it funny when the opposition leaders and its fanatical supporters condemned the suggestion to commemorate May 13th in a positive way. In other words, we want the people to remember that the harmonious relationship between races here in Malaysia was forged from the fires of a tragic incident. We also need to learn from the mistakes we sometime commit and to look into the future as citizens who are aware of our collective strengths.

There are a lot of lessons that can be learned from the racial riots.

Hence, it is good that people can know what really had happened.

But when National Unity Day was suggested, all fury came in from the opposition.

I would like to point out that back in 2007, when Dr Kua Kia Soong’s book was launched, all sundry were discussing about the May 13 riots.

A brief walk down memory lane will expose the pandemonium caused by the book. You can read it here, here, here and here.

But lately, the longest serving political party ruler in the world, Lim Kit Siang (42 years) and his offspring, Lim Guan Eng seemed determined not to let Malaysians remember the tragedy.

Like it or not, the maniacal discussions over the racial riots among the oppositions were rather subdued since early 2010. Probably because my series of articles in debunking Kua Kia Soong’s lies were not rebutted by anybody from the opposition’s camp.

I think it is indeed hard to rebut them since I had used the facts from the same point of references which Kua Kia Soong had used and importantly, I used the facts that were deftly left out by him in order to expose his wicked propaganda.

Hence, I find it odd that back in 1969, Lim Kit Siang whom had written a letter to the then Chairman of DAP, Chen Man Hin urging all Malaysians to remember the May 13 tragedy is now lambasting Ibrahim Ali about the suggestion of the May 13 museum.

Back in 1969, he said;

Let May 13 be boldly imprinted in the Malaysian memory and consciousness as a stark warning to Malaysians of the madness and cost of racialism. Otherwise, May 13 will soon be relegated to the footnotes of history, completely overshadowed by even greater racial holocausts which, in comparison, the May 13 events were no more than child’s play.

What is so wrong about a museum? The American Civil War which claimed lives of more than 700,000 people was commemorated with museums and memorial services throughout The United States. They even have re-enactments and movies out of it.

Imagine the bloodiest part of American history was remembered by all its citizens because they will learn from their past mistakes and the sacrifices made by their ancestors in order to gain some sense about their nation’s past.

Yet, we here chose not to commemorate May 13 at all. Worse, some of us dare not delve into the true cause of it. Some of us tried to pin the blame into the ruling government. But now, they just made some feeble misdirection after their bluff was called.

But we all know by now who Lim Kit Siang is. A dictator who still thinks he is relevant in the political platform. His tendencies of not knowing how to look into the mirror when he speaks is his greatest forte.

Take for example his defense for the new NUJ President, Hata Wahari.

Hata Wahari is an employee of Utusan Malaysia whom in recent times, had condemned his employer as practising ‘partisan reporting‘.

He cited example of Utusan Malaysia criticising Nazri Aziz in a series of spat in their editorial column. To digress a bit, Hata seemed to be confused with his own principles when he stated that Utusan must not be a lackey of Umno; meaning, “newspapers had to be independent from the influences of any political party, be it BN or PR”.

Is criticising an Umno/BN minister a sign of overly dependent to BN?

Hata moved on to say that “Utusan in the beginning of its formation before 1961 was a newspaper which played a pivotal role in championing the spirit of nationalism, it was progressive and liberal and free from any political influences. As a reporter, I support the principles set forth by the founders of Utusan which were never politically motivated”.

Utusan is currently seen as the leader of nationalism and also progressive and liberal enough as to know what is good enough for the country. Hence, in their editorial, they had no qualms in criticising just anybody and will support something they see beneficial such as the PPSMI.

And so, what was Hata blabbering about? Should Utusan not criticise and Umno minister anymore?

If the condemnation is unfounded, then surely it is the right of the employer to start a disciplinary action to an employee who is not showing much loyalty to its employer.

Lim Kit Siang should know this. He made a precedent concerning the same situation back in the late 90′s when he sacked YB Wee Choo Keong and a couple of other DAP stalwarts for ‘not showing enough affection’ towards the party leadership.

Surely the charge, ‘not showing enough affection’, however ridiculous it sounds, can also be used by Utusan Malaysia towards any of its employee since the DAP dictator used the same tactic to politically annihilate anybody who did not offer any obeisance towards him.

Can you imagine living under the longest serving political dictator if he becomes the Prime Minister? Any squeak or muffled sounds of disrespect will be silenced.

Therefore, I urge Lim Kit Siang to be cognisant to his own political history. He is fast becoming a body of inconsistencies rather than a serious entity.

Karpal Singh made a lethargic and exasperated attempt to clean himself of an ethical dilemma recently.

It started when a columnist in New Straits Times, Shamsul Akmar, alluded that Karpal Singh had seriously breach some legal ethics and questioned his conduct back in 1997 when the latter had publicly accused Anwar Ibrahim of sodomy and barely a year later, became a defence counsel for the sodomy case.

Karpal responded back by saying that indeed he had accused Anwar in 1997 but he added that Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir (now Tun), had deemed the allegations as baseless and slanderous.

This is Karpal’s only defence against his questionable conduct. But the toothless tiger seemed to lost his his memory when YB Wee Choo Keong and Shamsul Akmar exposed the fact that he made the allegations AFTER the then prime minister had tried to defend Anwar of any accusations.

Not only did Karpal accused Anwar in Parliament back in Octobver 1997, he repeated the allegations in a public place in early 1998 as well. That was a few months after Dr Mahathir made his statement!

And so, Karpal’s has trapped himself in the corner. I would think that a man of his stature would be embarrassed and strong enough to come clean about the whole situation.

As we always say, only the brave tells the truth. The cowards will remain inconsistent.

source : jebatmustdie